A. INITIA ARTIS
I. RHETORIKE PENES DEOS
1. Isocr. 13.2: 廒弇弇廔 怷怷彃羊怷彖 廒峟怷弮庰彖 帢庢 彃 怷彖峸庰, 廔甩庛宎 廔弮庢怷 廔 弮庰帠巹庢彖 廒廔 怷巹彄 帤徆帢彖 庰廒匿銜煙廔樞 庥帢廔 怷彃羊 庛庰怷 庰怷巹庢庥庰彖 廒庣彖 廔庰 帣怷弇庰怷弮峟彖怷 廔廔紮 帢廔彃僇 (sc. 彃僇 弮庰弇弇彖彖).
Indidem Aristid. de rhet. (45) II p. 19 Di. (16.15): 廔 廒徆 廒彃 廒 彃僇 弇帠彖 帤彖帢弮庣 帢廔 庛庰彃僇 廒形睡舒 庰廒區 廒彖庛怷, De dis contionem habentibus vel in iudicio certantibus v. Prol. artis rhet. P. S. p. 21, TroilI Prol. p.51.5 sq., Ioannis Doxapatri in Aphthon. p. 91.5 sq., Prol. in Aphthon. p. 163.12., Prol. in Hermog. . ibid. p. 188.15, Sopatros W. V5.30. Hanc etiam Chrysippus Stoicus traditionem sequitur 帢帢帣庣帢庤弮庰彖怷 庰廔怷帢 怷彖巹帤庢彖 庰廒僇諄敖 廔裕 帤庰庣彖廔裕 廒 彃 帤庣帢弇峟帠庰庛帢庣 庥帢廔 帤庣帢帣庰帣庢庥帢 彃 帤彖峎弮庰庣 怷彃 弇帠怷 (Plutarch. de aud. poet. 31 E = frg. ll 101 Arn.).
2. Proclus in rem publ. Platonis 1.69.4 Kroll: 廔 帤廔 庰庣庛怷彃羊 帤庢弮庣怷帠廔裒 怷廔庥 廒弇弇怷 廒 廔 彃憊弮彃, 帤庣宎 廔彖 庥帢廔 帤庢弮庢帠怷怷彃羊庣彖 廒弇弇怷庣 庛庰怷廔 庥帢宎 廒弇弇怷.
Apollo et Hermes de furto orationibus certantes iudice Iove inducuntur ab Hymni Homerici 4 poeta. Cf. Prol. artis rhet. P. S. p. 22.2 sq.
3. Schol. Hom. B ad Y 67 (apud Dielsium, Vorsokratiker 72.2): de Homero (帢廔僇 帢廔廔裕) 廔弮怷巹 廒庛宎 廔庰 庥帢廔 帢彃 帤庣帢庛峟庰庣 廔彖弮帢帢 庛庰彃僇 庣庛峟彖帢庣 . . . 彃 弇帠彃 帤廔 廔裕 廒弮彃彖, 庥帢廔 怷怷庣庥庰庣怷彃羊庣 怷怷庣. 怷廔怷 弮廔統 怷廔彖 <廔> 怷 廒怷弇怷帠巹帢 廒帢彃怷 廔卅 峎彖 庥帢廔 廒廔 庰帢帠峟彖怷 怷彃 彃疥煎割翁諄諫 庥弇.
Huius interpretationis videtur esse vestigi.um apud Philodemum rhet. II p. 171 . VII: S. et II p. 289 fr. XIII b.
4. Plato Crat. 407E: 廒弇弇廔 弮廔棒 怷彃羊 帠庰 廒怷庣庥庰 庰廔 弇帠怷彖 庣 庰廒僇諄敖 廔 廒弮彃, 庥帢廔 廔 廒弮庢彖峟帢 庰廒僇諄敖 庥帢廔 廔 廒帠帠庰弇怷彖 庥帢廔 廔 庥弇怷庣庥彖 庰 庥帢廔 廔 廒帢庢弇廔裕 廒彖 弇帠怷庣 庥帢廔 廔 廒帠怷帢庣庥彖, 庰廔 弇帠怷 帤彖帢弮巹彖 廒庣 彄剿帢 帢廔庢 廒 帢帠弮帢庰巹帢.
Sequitur etymologia 廒廔 怷彃 庰廒棲庰庣彖 (廔 帤廔 弇峟帠庰庣彖 帤峸 廒庣彖 庰廒棲庰庣彖) 弮峸帢庛帢庣. Hesiodi Erg. 79 (de Pandora) 廒彖 帤宎 廒帢 彖廔棒 庛彃庥庰 庛庰彃僇 庥峸徆 ex interpolatione natum putant.
5. Diog. Oenoand. fr. X col. II-III W. (Epicur.): 庥帢廔 彃僇 庛帠帠彖 帤廔 廒彖庰庥庰彖, 弇峟帠 帤廔 彃僇 庰 廔彖怷弮峎彖 庥帢廔 彃僇 彃用煎樁疢彖, 廔形 廒怷庣峸帢彖怷 廔區 帢 廒彖帢庛峟帠徆庰庣 怷廒 廒廔 帠彃 彖庰 [廒彖庛]怷庣. 弮峸庰 廔裕 弮彃彖 帢帢弇帢弮帣峎彖弮庰彖 庰廒區 帤庣帤帢庥帢弇巹帢彖, 廔甩 帢巹彖 庣彖庰, 庰庣帢彖廔棲 帠廔區 帢廔庢 帠庰 廒帤怷弇庰巹帢, 弮峸庰 庥弇.
庣彖庰: sic Hecataeus Abderita apud Diodorum Bibl. I 16: 廔廔 帠廔區 怷怷 (sc. 弮怷彃) 彃剿怷彖 弮廔統 峸彖 庰 庥怷庣彖廔棒 帤庣峎弇庰庥怷彖 帤庣帢庛庛彃彖帢庣 庥帢廔 怷弇弇廔 彃僇 廒彖彖弮彖 庰彃彖 怷庢帠怷巹帢. Distinguendum inter Mercurium linguae inventorem et eloquentiae, qualis apud rhetores produci solet, verum plena non est distinctio.
6. Cornutus epidromae p. 20.18 Lang: 帠峎彖庰庣 帤廔 廔 廒弮彃 廔 弇帠怷 廔及, 廔彖 廒峟庰庣弇帢彖 廔裒 廒﹡澄噤 廒徆 怷廔帢彖怷彃 怷廒 庛庰怷巹, 弮彖怷彖 廔裕 廒彖庛怷彖 彃僇 廒廔 帠彃 庤彃棲彖 弇怷帠庣庥廔裕 怷庣峸帢彖庰, 廔 帢廔 廒弇弇帢 廒徆怷帢怷彖 庰廒剿怷彖 帢廔怷巹. 廔彖弮帢帢庣 帤宎 廒廔 怷彃 廒庰彃彖 弮峸帢庛帢庣, 廔庰 廒廔 弇峟帠庰庣彖.
Cf. Etym. Magn. 376.20 帢廔 廔 廒彃 廔 弇峟帠.
7. Idem ibid. p. 25.14: 弇帢彖庛峎彖庰庣 帠廔區 廔帢庣怷弮庰彖怷 廔 怷帤庰帤怷帠弮峟彖帢 怷彃 廒彖庛怷庣 庥帢廔 庥弇峟彖 廒庛宎 廔庰 彃 庣庛帢彖庢庣 廔棒 廒弇峸庛庰庣帢彖, 廔庛庰彖 庣彖廔紮 庥帢廔 <廔紮巹庥弇怷怷彖 帢廔廔裕 帤庣廔 廔> 廒庣庥弇怷庣 弇帠怷庣 彃庛帢庣 弇峟帠怷庣繚 庥帢廔 帠廔區 廔 怷巹庤庰庛帢庣 彃僇 庰廒匿棲彖 弇帠彃 彃庛帢庣 廒棒棒圖彖 廒庣.
3 廔庛庰彖 庣彖廔區 libri
8. Aristid. de rhet. (45) II p. 135 Di (100.14): 廔 帤庰 庰廔磁 怷彃 庰 怷弮庢庛峟 廒帠帢庛庰廔剿 帤巹庥帢庣帢 弇峟帠怷彖怷 (sc. de hominum inopia) 庥帢廔 廒弮帢 庥帢庛宎 廒帢廔裕 庰廒匿銜煙廔樞 弇怷帠庣弮廔裕 怷彃 峎帠弮帢怷 彃僇 帢廔怷彃 帢巹帤彖 廒弮彃彖 庥庰弇庰庰庣 彃用煙怷庣庥廔棒 廒怷彖帢 廒弇庛庰彃彖 庰廒區 廒彖庛怷 . . . 廔裕 帤廔 廒弮彃彖 怷廔 怷廔 廒庥峟弇庰庰彖 廔甩庰 庛庰庣庥怷彃 帤庣峎帤怷庣彖 帤庣庰弇庰彃彖, 廒舒諄 峎彖庰 彃用煙怷庣庥彃 廒庰徆彃 弮庰峟怷庣庰彖, 廔甩庰 廔庛帢弇弮彃僇 庥帢廔 庰庣彃僇 庥帢廔 怷帤彃僇, 廒弇弇宎 廒庣弇庰徆峎弮庰彖怷彖 怷廔磁 廒巹怷 庥帢廔 帠庰彖彖帢庣怷峎怷 庥帢廔 廔區 庰庣 廒弮庰彖庰峎怷, 怷怷庣 廒帠庰庣巹帢庣 廔 帤彃剿怷彖, 廒舒褊 廔弮怷彃 彄剿 庰 帢廔怷廔磁 庥帢廔 怷彃羊 廒弇弇怷 彃棒僇舒團 廒怷庣庰彖 庥弇.
Mythum quem profert Aristides atque in sequentibus multis coloribus exornat, ex variis fontibus composuit. Mercurium rhetoricae inventorem alibiquoque laudat A., cf. II p. 14 IDi (13.7), p. 18 Di. (16.2); eiusdem artis tut怷r est ibid. p. 143 Di. (106.12), 弇帠怷庣 p. 5 Di. (5.1, p. 18 Di. (16.3. Consentiunt rhetores doctores, v. Prol. sylloge 20.8. 15, 90.23, 163.2, Schol. Thuc帠d. VI 27.1 p. 341.10 H. Euemeristicae rationis vestigium, secundum quam Hermes homo fuit inlustris 帢庣帤庰廔棲 弇帠彖, Ioannes Sardianus p. 164.15 sq. R. servavit.
9.Pseudodion. artis rhet. p. 285.8 Usener: 弮峎弇庣帢 帤廔 怷廒 廒庛弇庢帢廔 帤峟怷庣彖怷 廒彖 彃 廒廔 怷彃 弇帠怷 怷怷彃 庥帢廔 廒庣庥庰弇庰庰, 廔彖庰 弮廔統 庥帢廔 帢廔怷廔 廒弮怷彃 庰 庥帢廔 廒戕帢庥弇峟怷 弮帢庛庢帢巹 庰 庥帢廔 庤庢弇帢巹, 廔形 廔 弮廔統 庰廔庰廔棲 怷彃 弇帠怷 廒 帢廔廔 彃弮帢 弇帠怷 ...
Cf. Inscr. Kalybiis-Chassiis reperta, aetatis imperatorum: 廒弮彃 弇怷帠庣弮彃 彃剿怷彖 廔[峎彖庢 帤庣帤怷(7) D. arch. Mi庣t., Ath. A bt. 62 (1937, 9 N. 8. Augustinus De civ. dei 7.14: Sermo ipse dicitur esse Mercurius. Hae opiniones quam late dispersae sint, Acta docent Apost. 14.11 sq. 怷廒 庰 廔弇怷庣 廒匿棲彖庰, 廔 廒怷巹庢庰彖 帢彃缶銜諫, 廒彃帢彖 廔棒 彖廔棒 帢廔彃僇 庥帢怷彖庣廔 弇峟帠怷彖庰 怷廒 庛庰怷廔 廔弮怷庣庛峟彖庰 廒彖庛怷庣 庥帢峟帣庢帢彖 廔裒 峸弮彄剿. 廒庥峎弇怷彖 庰 廔裕 帢彖峎帣帢彖 巹帢, 廔裕 帤廔 帢彃缶銜諺 弮彃彖, 廒庰庣帤廔 帢廔廔裒 廒﹡ 廔 峸帠怷弮庰彖怷 怷彃 弇帠o. Inde Hermes 廒弮庢彖庰, 廒帠怷帢彃怷, 弇帠庣怷, 庰庣巹彖怷, 弇帠怷 庛彖庢怷彃庣 怷峸庢, sermonis dator in cultibus posteriorum (Eitrem, RE. 8.781 sq.). Sed communem posteriorum opinionem testimoniis amplius confirmare iam taedet; unum addo, cum 廒弮彃彖 弇怷帠庣弮彖 quoque induxerim, tum temporis inter 弇帠怷彖 et 弇怷帠庣弮彖 non esse distinctum, id quod loci in praefatione Plutarchi M怷r. Vol. VII sd. Bernardakis p. XXIX inter se oppositi egregie docent.
. HEROUM RHETORICE
1. Plato Crat. 398 D: 庥帢廔 廒反怷庣 怷彃羊怷 弇峟帠庰庣 怷廔磁 廒甩帢, 廒 廔庣 怷怷廔 廒羊帢彖 庥帢廔 彃用晅怷庰 {庥帢廔開 帤庰庣彖怷廔 庥帢廔 帤庣帢弇庰庥庣庥怷廔 廒彄僇 廒敖睡敖諄蹄蓿 廔彖庰. 廔 帠廔區 廒庰彃彖 弇峟帠庰庣彖 廒巹彖. 廔庰 怷廔彖 廒庣 弇峟帠怷弮庰彖, 廒彖 彃 廒庣庥彃 彖彃 弇庰帠弮庰彖怷庣 怷廒 廒甩庰 彃用晅怷峟 庣彖庰 庥帢廔 廒庢庣庥怷廔 弮帣帢巹彖怷庣彖, 廔甩庰 彃用煙彖 庥帢廔 怷庣彃僇 帠峟彖怷 帠巹帠彖庰帢庣 廔 廒＋庣庥廔裕 彃缶銜諺.
Respiciunt Prol. in Hermog. P. S. p. 188.18 R., Sopatros in Hermog. V 6. 1 W.
2. Cratinus 峓庰巹庣彖 fr. 1 Mein. (Bekk. Anecd. p. 535.13):
M帢庥峎庣怷 廒缶 廔 廔 怷彃 帣巹怷
帣怷怷彃庣 廔裒 廔 彖彃缶, 廔彖 庰廒剿怷彖 廒彖帤庰
廒帠帢彖怷彖庰 廒﹡棲弇帠彃 怷巹彄
帣怷彃僇 庰庣怷庥帢弇弇庰彃.
Intelleguntur, qui Chironis aetate erant. 廒﹡棲弇怷帠怷 怷巹帢 i. e. rhetorice.
3. Isocr. 12 (Panath.) 204-6: 帠彖庰庣 帤宎 廔＋ 廒廔 怷庣怷彃羊怷, 廒卅 廒峸彃 庣彖廔區 彃僇 庰廔 怷彖怷彖彖, 怷彃帢 彃僇 廒庣庢帤庰弮峎彖 庥峎弇弇庣帢 彖怷弮巹庤怷庣彖 庰廒僇諄敖, 庥帢廔 弮庰廔 帢彃羊帢 怷 彖怷 廒巹彖, 廒徆 怷廔 峉帢庣彄剿帢庣 帠峎彖怷庣彖 廒彖 庰弇怷怷彖彖峸彃 庥帢怷庣庥o彃缶誕庰. 怷廔帤庰彃 帠廔區 廔庣 怷廔 彃僇 弮廔統 廒庣庢帤庰弮峎彖 怷庥庣彖庰彃 廔棒 庰廔峟帣庰庣帢彖 廔棒 庰廔 怷彃羊 庛庰怷彃羊 庥帢廔 廔棒 帤庣庥帢庣怷彖庢彖 廔棒 庰廔 怷彃羊 廒彖庛怷 庥帢廔 廔棒 彖庢庣彖 廔棒 庰廔 廔區 廒弇弇帢 峎徆庰庣, 峉帢庣峎帢 帤宎 廒彖帢彃缶裕 庥帢怷庣庥庰彃彖 怷廔 弇庰巹 峸怷庣彖 廒彃僇 廒帢庥怷巹彖. 怷彖 帤宎 怷廔 廒彖彖 庰廒 弮廔統 帠峎彖庰庣 廒弇庢庛彃 弇峟帠彖, 怷怷 峎庥彖 庰廔庰廔區 帠庰帠庰彖彃庛帢庣 彃僇 庥帢弇弇巹彖 廒庣庢帤庰弮峎彖, 廒彖帢帠庥帢彃彖 廒庣 怷彃羊 怷弇弇帢彃 帠庰彖庰帢彃 庰怷彖 帠庰帠怷彖帢 廔僇 峉帢庣峎帢 廒彖帢彃缶裕 庥帢怷庣庥彃帢庣, 弮廔 弮庰峟庰庣彖 帢廔彃僇, 弮峸庰 怷彃羊 廒廔 峇怷巹帢彖 帢庰帢弮峟彖怷 弮峸庰 怷彃羊 庰廔 廒戕帢庥弇峟帢 庥帢廔 庢峟帢 帠庰帠怷彖帢 弮峸庰 巹彖 廔裕 庣廔裒 弮峸庰 彃疥敖棒疥樁敖諄裒彖 弮峸宎 廒廒匿敖筵螂彖 弮峸庰 彃僇 廒弇弇彖 弮庢帤峟彖帢 彃僇 廔弮彖怷弮峟彖彖 廒廔 帢彃 廒庰帢彃 帢帢庣, 廒弇弇廔 庰帤彃 廔棒 帤徆帢彖 帢庢彖 廒帢彖帢 廒庰庣彖. 庰廒 帤廔 廔 弮廔統 弇帢彃僇 帠峎彖庰庣, 怷峸庥庰庣 帤廔 怷彃羊 廒廔 庛庰彃僇 帠庰帠怷彖帢 庥帢廔 彃庛帢庣 帢帢庣 弮彄僇銜銜諺 彃僇 廒弇弇彖 庥帢廔 庥帢帢帤庰彃徆帢庣 怷彃 廒庣帠庣帠彖怷弮峟彖怷庣, 怷廔庥 廒庣彖 廔 怷廔 弮帢巹彖庰庛帢庣 帤徆庰庣 廒帢庣 怷彃 廒庥怷帢庣彖.
9 庰廒 弮廔統 廔 alii (廔 om. 2) 15 彃僇 彖彃缶 廔弮彖怷弮峟彖彖 v. l. 17 帤廔 庥帢廔 怷廔磁 v. l. 19 廒庥怷怷庣彖 v. l.
Aristot. Polit. 3.14 1285b3 峟帢怷彖 帤宎 庰廒僇棒諫 弮怷彖帢巹帢 帣帢庣弇庣庥彃 帢廒 庥帢廔 怷廔磁 廒＋庣庥怷廔磁 彖怷 廒庥怷庣帢巹 庰 庥帢廔 峎庣帢庣 帠庣帠彖弮庰彖帢庣 庥帢廔 彖弮怷彖. 帤庣廔 帠廔區 廔 怷廔磁 廔樞怷 帠庰彖峟庛帢庣 怷彃 弇峸庛怷 庰廔庰帠峟帢 庥帢廔 峟彖帢 廒 弇庰弮怷彖 廒帠巹帠彖怷彖帢 帣帢庣弇庰彃 廒庥彖彖...
4. Plato Phaedr. 261 B (doctrinam illudens): 峉. 廒弇弇宎 廒 廔區 峟怷怷 庥帢廔 廔帤峟 峟彖帢 弮彖怷彖 庰廔 弇帠彖 廒庥峸庥怷帢, 廒 廒彖 I弇巹彃 怷弇峎庤怷彖庰 彖庰帠帢峎庢彖, 彃僇 帤廔 帢弇帢弮峸帤怷 廒彖峸庥怷怷 帠峟帠怷彖帢;
Ludere pergens Plato Phaedrum respondentem fingit ne se quidem Nestoris novisse artes, sed fortasse Gorgiam a Socrate Nestorem quondam intellegi, vel Ulixem quendam esse Thrasymachum vel Theodorum. Ipsum Ulixem artis rhetoricae peritum iam quarto a. C. saeculo visum esse etiam Antisthenis interpretationum Homericarum fragmentum in Porphyrii ad Odysseam Quaestionibus servatum (infra B XIX 10) docet, quo fragmento Ulixis 怷弇怷怷 cognomen ita explicatur, ut variarum orandi flexionum, quibus eaedem sententiae proferuntur, potens vocetur. Iterum Plato Phaedri 269 A ad 廔裕 弮庰弇巹帠庢彖 廒帤帢怷彖 廒 庥帢廔 庰庣庥弇峟帢 provocat tamquam rhetoricae artis censores, quo loco qui Antiphontem sub Adrasti nomine latere coniecerunt, acumen verborum vix videntur perspexisse. Tyrtaei verba (fr. 9.8 D) a Platone respici monuit Spengel. Notabis Adrasti declamationes apud posteriores exstare, eundem adparere inter heroas eloquentes apud Philodemum (infra A II 7 adn.).
5. Philod. rhet. II p. 71 fr. VIII 5 Sudh.: 怷廔 庥庰巹彖 帤廔 帢弇庣彖弇怷帠庰彃彖 廒彖帢帠庥帢彃怷彖 庰廒僇諄敖 彃 廒怷帤庰巹徆庰 庥帢峎 帠庰 廔棒 帤彖帢弮庣彖 怷廔庛廔統 帤庣帢庰怷庢 怷彃 帤庣帤峎庥怷彖怷 弇帠怷 廒甩帢 廒反怷庣 [廒匿棒圖]帢, 弮廔 弮帢庛彖帢 廔棒 彃用煙怷庣庥峸彖, 帤彖[帢]怷[廔磁 彃用煙怷庰庰庣彖 帠庰帠怷彖峟]彖帢庣.
3 弇帠怷 P
6. Philod. rhet. II p. 119 fr. XVI 8: 廒庥怷[弇怷庛] 帤[廔 庥帢]廔 帤庣帢弇庰[庛庰]廔剿 庰[廔 彃跑彖 廒＋[彖], 廔庣 帤[]彖帢怷廔 [弇]峟[帠庰庣彖] 廒羊帢彖, 廒庣彖峎[帢] . ..
2 帤庣帢弇庰庛庰巹: quis? An Theodorus Cyrenaeus? (Sudh. l. l. p. 116 fr. 1X 6.) - 廔庰 P
7. Philod. rhet. II p. 201 fr. XV: [廔棒 帤廔 怷]庣帢庢彖 [帤]彖帢- 弮庣彖, 怷廒舒敖 [庰]廒跋]庰彖 廔帤[庰廔磁] 庥帢廔 峟 庥帢[廔 峉]弇彖 庥帢廔 庰[弮庣怷庥弇彃 庥帢廔 ]庰庣庥弇[彃, 彃用愍怷庣[庥峸彖.
Cf. Philod. rhet. II p. 76 fr. III p. 77 fr. IV, ubi de heroibus serm怷 est, Odysseus et Adrastus nominantur, Stoicus impugnatur, ingeniose suppleta a Sudhausio. Inde Aristid. or. 46, II p. 180 Di., Periclem, Ulixem, Nestora componit, ubi scholion (III p. 480, 16 Di.) 峎弇庣彖 彃用晅怷庣 帢帢帣峎弇弇庰庣 廔裕 庰庣庥弇峟帢繚 彃用晅怷庰 帠廔區 廒羊帢彖 怷廔怷庣 怷彃 廒弇弇庢彖庣庥怷彃 帢庰弮帢怷.
8. Syrianus in Hermogenem c怷mm. II p. 7.3 Rabe: 廔 帤廔 廒徆 廒彃 帤庢弇帢帤廔棵 廒宎 怷廔庰 廒 彃僇 廒彖庛彖 廔峟庢 庣繚 彖帤怷弮怷 帠廔區 廒 彃用煙怷庣庥廔 彃 弇帠彃 彃僇 彃僇, 庥帢廔 廔 峟怷 庰 庥帢廔 峖怷巹彖庣庥怷 帢弇帢弮峸帤怷 庰 庥帢廔 廔帤峟 庥帢廔 彃僇 廒彖 廒裕銜脊興 彃用煙彖 廒庥庰彃怷 帢廔 廒彖庛怷庣 廒 彃用煙怷庣庥峸, 庰廒 帠庰 庥帢廔 廔裕 峇怷庣- 庤峸彖庣怷彖 庣庛峟帢 帢廔僇 廒彖庣怷庣 弇帠彖 廒彖 峇怷庣庤彃彖庣 峟彖帢 帠峎庰庣彖 庰 庥帢廔 帤庣帤峎庥庰庣彖 廒彖庛怷, 怷廔磁 帤廔 廒彖峟 怷彖 廔 彄僇割樁 廔睡 廒庰彃 弮庰帢帤庣徆帢彖帢 廒 廒庥 怷彃 庥帢帢庥弇弮怷彃 廔睡 怷彃 廒弇弇怷庣 廒峎彖庣庥庰 弇峸庛庢.
庣庛峟 nomen a verbo 庰巹庛 ductum ansam dedit: Paus. II 31.3 (4) de Musarum Troezeni sanctuario: 廒彖帢彃缶裕 峖庣庛峟帢 帤庣帤峎徆帢庣 弇帠彖 峟彖庢彖 帢廔 庥帢巹 庣 帣庣帣弇巹怷彖 峖庣庛峟 帤廔 帠帠帢弮弮帢, 廔廔 廒彖帤廔裒 廒庥帤怷庛廔統 廒庣帤帢巹怷, 庥帢廔 帢廔廔裒 廒庰弇庰徆峎弮庢彖. Erat enim Pittheus 廒彖廔棲 弇帠庣怷 廒彖 怷彃 庰 庥帢廔 怷帢怷 secundum Plutarchum Thes. 3, cf. Schol. Euripidis Hippol. 11. Haec igitur traditio aetate imperatorum Romanorum antiquior fuit. Est tamen etiam mirabilius, quod legitur apud Philodemum rhet. I p. 337 col. XXX S. 彃剿怷彖 弮廔統 怷巹彖彖 怷庰庥峟怷彖 廒缶, 弮峸怷宎 怷廔庥 廒帢庣彃 彃僇 彖庰峟彖 廔裕 庛怷彖 彃 彃用煙怷庣庥彃, 廒弇弇宎 廒庣庰巹彖庢 帤庣廔 彃僇 庥帢庢帠怷庣彃僇. 廒彖 帠廔區 廒弮帢彖彃剿 廒弇弇怷 庣 弇峟帠庣彖, 庛帢彃缶樁 庰廒僇諄敖 廔棒 怷廔 帠庰 [帢庥]庣庥廔棒 帤[彖帢弮]庣彖 怷廒敖諺稼庰廔跑 弮庰弮庛庰弮峟彖庢彖 [庰廔 ]廔裕 廔弇庥[怷彖 庥帢廔 怷廔榜 廔弮怷巹怷. Itaque non solum Odysseus, verum etiam avus eius Autolycus in oratorum numerum relati sunt, ac memineris de certamine inter Autolycum et Sisyphum facto. Ipse quidem Demosthenes Aeschini Sisyphus arudit or. II 43, cuius nomen apud Philodemum apparet loco ceteroquin misere mutilo rhet. II p. 170 fr. V S.
9. Prol. in Hermogenis 庰廔 峎庰彖 P. S. 189.7 R. = W VII 5/6: 弇峟帠怷庣 帤峟 庣彖庰 帤庣庥帢彖庣庥廔裕 弇帠怷彖 庰廒區庢庥峟彖帢庣 彃剿怷彖 庰彖庰庛峟帢 廔裕 帢庢帠廔裕 彃僇 廒庛庢彖帢巹彖, 廔 庥帢廔 廒廔 峇怷巹帢彖 廒巹庥庰怷 {彄僇銜銜諺 帤廔 弇峟帠怷庣彖 廒彖庣彃僇誕帢 怷彃羊怷彖 廔裕 彃用晅怷帢}, 庥帢<庢帠oo彃缶誕>帢 庢峟 庰廔 彃僇 帢弇弇帢彖庣帤彃僇.
Cf. Sopatri W v 6.12. Plut. Thes. 32 sq., unde haec ex aliqu怷 atthidographo fluxisse adparet. Libanius, or. 64.21.
III. HOMERUS TESTIS HEROUM RHETORICAE
1. Eratosthenes apud Strabonem A 2.5 (C. 17): 廒 帤廔 彃用煙怷庣庥廔 彖庢巹 廒庣 帤峸怷 庰廔 弇帠怷, 廒彖 廒庣帤庰巹庥彖帢庣 (sc. Homerus) 帢宎 廔弇庢彖 廔棒 怷巹庢庣彖 {廔帤庰廔磁} 廒彖 彃 帤庣帢庰巹彄, 廒彖 帢彃 弇庣帢彃, 廒彖 彃 庰帣庰巹彄, 廒彖 彄 庢庣彖繚 廒弇弇宎 廔庰 帤廔 廔帢 庰 弮庰帠峎弇庢彖 廒庥 峸庛庰怷 庰廒舒 庥帢廔 廒庰帢 彖庣峎帤庰庣彖 廒怷庣庥帢 庰庣弮庰巹彃庣彖, 怷廔庥 廒彖 廒庰庣宎 廔帤彃巹 帠宎 廒巹庰庣庰 帣怷廔裒 廒弇弇怷.
2. Cic. Brut. 40: neque enim iam Troicis temporibus tantum laudis in dicendo Ulixi tribuisset Homerus et Nestori, quorum alterum vim habere voluit, alterum suavitatem. Ibid. 50: Menelaum ipsum dulcem illum quidem tradit Homerus, sed pauca dicentem.
3. Quint. inst. 12.10.64: nam et Homerus brevem quidem cum iocunditate et propriam (id enim est non deerrare verbis宎) et carentem supervacuis eloquentiam Menelao dedit, quae sunt virtutes generis illius primi, et ex ore Nestoris dixit dulciorem 5 melle profluere sermonem宎, qua certe delectatione nihil fingi maius potest; sed summam expressurus {est} in Ulixe facundiam et magnitudinem illi vocis et vim orationis nivibus {et} copia verborum atque impetu parem tribuit.
6 regressurus 7 illi vicisset cum orationi.
4. Gell. 6.14.7: sed ea ipsa genera dicendi iam antiquitus tradita ab Homero sunt tria in tribus: magnificum in Ulixe et ubertum, subtile in Menelao et cohibitum, mixtum moderatumque in Nestore.
5. [Plut.] de vita et p怷esi Homeri 172: 怷廔庥 廒弮峟弇庢庰 帤宎 怷廔帤廔 帢帢庥庢巹帢庣 怷彃羊 彃用晅怷帢. 廔裕 弮廔統 帠廔區 峟怷帢 廒﹡氮蝶彖 庥帢廔 怷庢彖彃 怷彃 廒庥怷怷庣彖 庰廒區峎帠庰庣, 廔裕 帤廔 庰彖峟弇帢怷彖 帣帢弇帠怷彖 庥帢廔 庰廔帢庣彖 庥帢廔 怷彃 怷庥庰庣弮峟彖怷 帠峎彖怷彖帢, 廔裕 帤宎 廔帤峟帢 怷弇弇彃 庥帢廔 庥彖彃 彃 帤庰庣彖庢庣 彃僇 弇帠彖 庥庰庢弮峟彖怷彖. 帢彃羊帢 帠廔區 怷彃 帤廔 怷怷庣 廒甩庣彖 廔 廒彖峸彖 弮帢庰彃, 廒庥怷帢 帢廔彃僇, 廔庰 庰帣庰怷彖庰 廒巹庥怷彖怷 庰廒區 廔棒 廒樁銜團諺.
6. Sopatros in Hermogenem c怷mm. W V 6.3: 帢巹彖庰帢庣 帤廔 庥帢廔 廔 怷庣庢廔棲 帢彖怷彃帢 庰廒匿氮蝦 彃用煙怷庣庥彃 帢帢帤庰巹帠弮帢帢. 廔裕 弮廔統 帠廔區 帢彖 庥帢廔 彖怷弮怷彖 庥帢廔 廒怷帤庰庣庥庣庥廔裕 彃用晅怷峎 庢庣 弇峟帠庰庣彖 彖庣峎帤庰庣彖 廔弮怷庣帢 庥帢廔 廔裕 庥彖廔裕 庥帢廔 彖怷弮怷彖, 怷廔帤廔統 帤廔 廒彷怷彖 廒怷帤庰庣庥庣庥廔裕 帢彃羊帢 弮峟彖, 廒弇弇廔 弮峎弇帢 弇庣帠峟. 怷廒僇棒舒 帤廔 廔棒 廒帢徆巹帢彖 彃 帤庢弮帢帠帠巹帢 庥帢廔 怷廔磁 廒帤庣帢庥巹 庥帢廔 廒彖峟彖 弇峟帠怷彖帢 廔怷彃怷巹 怷峟 庰廒區庣彖, 廔甩庰 廔裕 庰巹庢彖, 廔 彃乒 廒庰帢 庰廔僇 彄庣彖 廒庥怷弮峎 庰 怷弇弇峎 庰 廒用棒舒.
Cf. Sen. epist. 40.2. Auson. pr怷f. Burd. XXI 16 grat. act. VIII 19, epist. 12.10 sq. p. 239 P.
7. Prol. art. rhet. an怷n. P. S. p. 22.14 R.: 帤庰庰怷彖 帤峟 廒庣 庥庰峎弇帢庣怷彖, 廒彖 彄 廒弇峟帠怷弮庰彖, 庰廒 庥帢廔 廒彖 廒甩庣彖 廒 彃用煙怷庣庥峸. 廒帤庰庣 帠廔區 庥帢廔 庥帢弇彃剿 廒帤庰庣 廔 彃僇 庛庰彃僇 帤庢弮庣怷帠峸弮帢帢 怷廔磁 廒庥 庛庰彃僇 帢彖峟彖帢 怷 庥帢帢庛帢庣. 廒 怷巹彖彖 怷彖 廒峎彖彖 弮峎 廔 庛庰峟庣怷 廒﹡澄彖 庥帢廔 廒敖舜怷峎彖庢 廔弮庢怷, 廔 庰廒區 帢彖庰彖 庰 庥帢廔 帢廔紮 廒及割敖割 廔區 庰廔 怷彖 庤庢峸庰庣 廒﹡澄彖. 怷廔怷 帠廔區 帣怷弇弮庰彖怷 庢弮彄僇諄敖 廒﹡澄彖, 廔庣 廒彖 怷彃 廒甩庣彖 廒庥帢峟帢 怷庣庢 彃 彃用煙怷庣庥彃 庰廔庢帢庣, 庰廒區峎帠庰庣 廔裕 峟怷帢 弮帣怷弇怷彖 廔彖帢, 庰廔 怷廔 弇峟帠庰庣繚
怷彃庣 帤廔 廒 廒﹡棲庰廔棲 廒彖怷庰, 弇庣帠廔磁 弇巹彖 廒帠怷庢峸, 怷彃 庥帢廔 廒廔 帠弇庢 弮峟弇庣怷 帠弇庥巹彖 彃用倀舒 帢廔帤峸.
帢廔 廔 弮峟彖 帠弇庥廔 庥帢廔 怷庢彖廔紮 彃 彃用煙怷庣庥彃 廒庰庣彖 廔裕 峟怷帢 廒徆峟庢彖庰彖 廔 怷庣庢峸繚 廔 帤廔 彖怷彖怷彖 庥帢廔 廒巹帢庣 帤庣廔 怷彃 庰彖庰弇峎怷 廒彖帤庰巹庥彖帢庣, 庰廒區廔樁 庰廔 帢廔怷彃汕
廒弇弇宎 廒反怷庣 M庰彖峟弇帢怷 廒庣怷峎帤庢彖 廒帠庰庰
帢彃羊帢 弮峟彖, 廒弇弇廔 弮峎弇帢 弇庣帠峟.
庰廒區峟庰庣 帤廔 庥帢廔 廔裕 廔帤峟帢, 廔 怷帢弇廔裕 庥帢廔 廔徆廔 庥帢廔 廔 怷帤廔裕 庥帢廔 廔 弇帢弮廔裕 彃 彃用煙怷庣庥彃 帤庣宎 帢廔怷彃 庰廒匿睡諺諄耆帢庣 帣怷弇弮庰彖怷, 弇峟帠彖 庰廔 帢廔怷彃汕
廒弇弇宎 廔庰 帤廔 廔帢 庰 弮庰帠峎弇庢彖 廒庥 峸庛庰怷 庰廒舒,
庥帢廔 廒庰帢 彖庣峎帤庰庣彖 廒怷庣庥帢 庰庣弮庰巹彃庣彖,
怷廔庥 廒彖 廒庰庣宎 廔帤彃巹 帠宎 廒巹庰庣庰 帣怷廔裒 廒弇弇怷.
廔庣 帤廔 庥帢廔 廔 廔彖怷弮帢 彃 彃用煙怷庣庥彃 廒缶 廒帠彖弮峟彖怷彖 怷彃 廒甩庣, 峟庰庣 廔裕 峖怷巹彖庣庥帢 廔裒 廔裕 廒庣弇弇峟帢 弇峟帠怷彖帢繚
怷廔彖庰庥峎 弮庰 o峟庢庥庰 帤庣帤帢庥峟弮庰彖帢庣 峎帤庰 峎彖帢,
弮庛彖 庰 彃用煙彃宎 廒弮庰彖帢庣 庢庥彃峎 庰 廒帠彖.
廔庣 帤廔 庥帢廔 庛庰巹帢 廒庣彖怷巹帢 彃庤庰庣 廔 彃用晅, 廒徆 帢廔怷彃 怷彃 廔弮峸怷 廒庣 庣帢庛帢庣繚 庢廔 帠峎繚
廒弇弇廔 庛庰廔裒 弮怷廔棒 廒庰庣 峟庰庣, 怷廒 帤峟 宎 廒 帢廔廔裕
庰弮庰彖怷庣 弇庰怷庣彖, 廔 帤宎 廒帢弇峟 廒帠怷庰庰庣.
23 sq. cf. Philod. rhet. I p. 187.22 sq., Cic. de orat. 3,57, Brut. 13,50, Aristid. de rhet. (45) p. 30 sq. Di. (25), Doxapatri in Aphthonium P. S. p. 91.8 sq, Schol. Townl. Il. I 443, Eustathius ad Il. I 441. Lysiam, Dem怷sthenem, Isocratem in comparationem vocat Schol. ABT ad 212 (216), Eustathius ad 213.
Aliter Troili Prol. p. 51.10 R.: 廒廔 帤廔 彃僇 庛庰彃僇 庰廒區 怷廔磁 廒甩帢 廒缶銜裕, 庥帢廔 怷彃羊怷 峎弇庣彖 廒帤峸弇庰彖 廔 廔弮庢怷 怷峎帢 彃 M庰彖庰弇峎彃 廔 弮帣怷弇庰庣庥廔裕 帤庣廔 怷彃 庰廒區庰彃彖繚
帢彃羊帢 弮廔統 廒弇弇廔 弮峎弇帢 弇庣帠峟 廒帠庰庰,
廔 帤廔 帢彖庢帠庣庥廔裕 彃 峟怷庣, 廒彖 怷廒煙 弇峟帠庰庣繚
怷彃 庥帢廔 廒廔 帠弇庢 弮峟弇庣怷 帠弇庥巹彖 彃用倀舒 帢廔帤峸,
帢彃羊帢 帤宎 廒帠庥弮庣帢庣庥峎 庰廒區庣 弇廔棒 帤庰巹庥彖庣彖, 廔＋ 庰巹帢 廔裕 廒帠庥弮庣峎庤怷彖帢 庥帢廔
帠弇庥廔睡 庰廒僇諄敖 庥帢廔 怷怷廔匿 庥帢廔 庰庣庛峸彖庣怷彖, 廒彖庛帢 庢巹繚
庥帢廔 廒庰帢 彖庣峎帤庰庣彖 廒怷庣庥帢 庰庣弮庰巹彃庣,
廔 帤庣庥帢彖庣庥廔裕 廒怷帤庣帤怷廔磁 彃 廔帤庰彃.
Similes ineptiae leguntur in posteriorum commentariis P. S. p. 93.1 sq., p. 188.21 sq., p. 268.11 sq. R. Auctorem habent Telephum Pergamenum, ut videtur (p. 189.3 sq. R.). Sed opiniones antiquis iam temporibus conceptae quantum valuerint ad Homerum interpretandum et quomodo variatae sint, docet etiam Anonymus 庰廔 庢弮峎彖 rhet. gr. III p. 152.12 sq. Sp., quocum consentiunt Excerpta Syriani ex codice Monacensi apud Spengelium Art. Scr. p. 119 adn. Ceterum cf. Schrader, Hermae 37.530 sq. Hinc factum est, ut ii, qui de actione scriberent, heroibus 庛帢弮怷廔棒 tribuerent etiam 廔庥庣庣彖 (Philod. rhet. I p. 200.21).
8. Schol. Hom. Townl. Il. I 443: 怷廒 庰廔 帢庥帢 帤廔 庥帢廔 峇庣巹帢彖 廔庰怷彖 (i. e. post Phoenicem Homericum) 廒徆庰庥弮庢帢彖 帢廔峸彖 (sc. 廔棒 彃用煙怷庣庥峸彖).
2 峇庣巹帢彖 corr. Bekk.: 庢巹帢彖.
IV. HOMERUS RHETORICAE INVENTOR
1. Philod. rhet. fr. XXI (II p. 111 Sudh.): 廒弇弇宎 怷廔 廒彖庰怷巹 庣彖峟 廒弮庰彖, 廔甩庰 庣弇怷怷巹帢 弮廔統 帢廔廔裕 庰廔庰廔棒 弇庰帠弮庰彖怷彖 廒庥怷庰庣彖, 怷廔巹 庰 彃僇 庥庣庣庥彃僇 弮彖怷彖 廒弇弇廔 庥帢廔 彃僇 庣弇怷彖 帢廔彃僇, 怷廔帤廔 弮庣彄剿 弮彖怷彖 帢廒救峟庰 廒弇弇廔 帢彃僇蝓 廔 帤廔 彃用煙怷庣庥彃 庰廔[庰廔棒 彖怷弮巹]庤庰庛帢庣 峟帢 [廔怷弇帢弮帣峎彖庰庣彖].
Cf. etiam Sudh. Philod. Suppl. p. XX峓III et ad rem Strabonis A 2, 3 (C. 16), Plut. de vita et poesi Homeri 92 sq., Quintiliani Inst. 12.11.21, Dionysii Hal. ep. ad Pompeium II 225.16. Peculiaris haec Stoicorum fuit sententia (Striller, De Stoicorum studiis rhetoricis, Bresl. philol. Abh. I.2 p. 11, Brozoska, De canone decem oratorum quaestiones, Breslau 1883 p. 59) vix tamen ab his primis prolata. Respicias velim, quae Antisthenes de 怷弇怷怷 vocabuli Homerici sensu rhetorico docuit (B XIX 10).
2. Quint. Inst. 10.1.46: igitur, ut Aratus ab Iove incipiendum putat, ita nos rite coepturi ab Homero videmur. hic enim, quem ad modum ex Oceano dicit ipse amnium fontiumque cursus initium capere, omnibus eloquentiae partibus exemplum et ortum dedit. hunc nemo in magnis rebus sublimitate, in parvis proprietate superaverit. idem laetus ac pressus, iucundus et gravis, tum copia tum brevitate mirabilis, nec poetica modo, sed oratoria virtute eminentissimus. nam ut de laudibus, exhortationibus, consolationibus taceam, nonne vel nonus liber, quo missa ad Achillem legatio continetur, vel in primo inter duces illa contentio vel dictae in secundo sententiae omnis litium ac consiliorum explicant artes? adfectus quidem vel illos mites vel hos concitatos nemo erit tam indoctus, qui non in sua potestate hunc auctorem habuisse fateatur. age vero, non utriusque operis sui ingressu in paucissimis versibus legem prohoemiorum non dico servavit sed constituit? nam et benevolum auditorem invocatione dearum, quas praesidere vatibus creditum est, et intentum proposita rerum magnitudine et docilem summa celeriter comprensa facit. narrare vero quis brevius quam qui mortem nuntiat Patrocli, quis significantius potest quam qui Curetum Aetolorumque proelium exponit? iam similitudines, amplificationes, exempla, digressus, signa rerum et argumenta cetera quaeque probandi ac refutandi sunt ita multa, ut etiam qui de artibus scripserunt plurima earum rerum testimonia ab 25 hoc poeta petant. nam epilogus quidem quis umquam poterit illis rogantis Achillen Priami precibus aequari? quid? in verbis, sententiis, figuris, dispositione totius operis nonne humani ingenii modum excedit?
6 superavit al. ll. 9 consolationibusque dett. nonus P: unus rell. 15 sui om. EPW ingressus 16 et om. GH 26 Priami rogantis Ach. G H.
Breviter Quintilianus haec comprehendit inst. 2.17.8: Nos porr怷, quando coeperit huius rei doctrina, non laboramus exquirere, quamquam apud Homerum et praeceptorem Phoenicem cum agendi tum etiam loquendi et oratores plures et omne in tribus ducibus orationis genus et certamina quoque proposita eloquentiae inter iuvenes invenimus, quin in caelatura clipei Achillis et lites sunt et actores. - Praeivisse Graecum auctorem eumque antiquum, comparatus docet Dionysius de comp. 24 p. 121.2 sq. Us. Rad.
3. [Plut.] de vita et poesi Homeri 74: 廒庰廔 帤廔 帢彖廔裒 怷彃 廒庥怷弮峟彖怷 帢宎廒彖庛怷庣 弇帠怷 廔 弮峟彖 巹 廒庣彖 廒救怷庣庥, 廔 帤廔 庛庰庢庣庥, 廔 帤廔 怷弇庣庣庥, 峟庰 庛庰帢弮庰庛帢, 庰廒 庥帢廔 怷彖 庰廒區廔僇 帢廒 廒帢廔 帢宎 帢廔彃. Ibid. 161: 廔 帤廔 怷弇庣庣庥廔裒 弇帠怷 廒庣彖 廒彖 彃 彃用煙怷庣庥彃 峟彖庢, 廒彷 廒彖廔裒 廔弮庢怷 彃剿怷 帠峟帠怷彖庰彖, 廔＋ 帢巹彖帢庣. 庰廒 帠廔區 廒庣彖 廒 彃用煙怷庣庥廔 帤彖帢弮庣 怷彃 庣庛帢彖彃剿 弇峟帠庰庣彖, 巹 弮彄僇銜銜諺 廔弮峸怷 廒彖 彃 帤彖峎弮庰庣 帢彃 庥帢庛峟庢庥庰彖;
In sequentibus agit de oeconomia, de prohoemiis, de variis orationis generibus, in multis congruens cum Quintiliano. Cf. cap. 162 et Quint. 10.1.50; 163 et Quint. 10.1.48; 169 et Quint. 10.1.47; 174 (74) et Quint. 10.1.49.
4. Eustathius ad Od. 1379. 60: 廔 峎庢 彃 廒彖 弇帠怷庣 峟彖庢 庥帢庛庢帠庢峸, 廒徆 怷廔 怷廒煎 庣彖怷 廔庥庰帢彖怷彃 峎彖庰 怷帢弮怷廔 庥帢廔 彄剿帢庣 弇怷帠庣庥彃僇 弮庰庛帤彖 庢帠帢巹.
Cf. supra ad A IV 2 (Dion帠sii de c怷mp. p. 121.7), Pseudodionsii p. 310.24, p. 324.6 Us.
V. INITIA VERA
1. Diog. Laert. 8.57: 廒庣怷峟弇庢 帤廔 廒彖 彃 峉怷庣彃 (fr. 65) 庢庣 彃剿怷彖 廒弮庰帤怷庥弇峟帢 彃用煙怷庣庥廔棒 庰廔庰彃彖, 峸彖彖帢 帤廔 帤庣帢弇庰庥庣庥峸彖. Cf. ibid. 9.25.
2. Sextus adv. math. 7.6: 廒弮庰帤怷庥弇峟帢 弮廔統 帠廔區 廔 廒庣怷峟弇庢 庢廔 彃剿怷彖 彃用煙怷庣庥廔棒 庥庰庥庣彖庢庥峟彖帢庣.
3. Diog. Laert. 8.58: 庢廔 帤廔 峉峎怷 廒彖 怷彃 帣巹怷庣 (frg. 12, FHG. 3.162), 廔庣 庥帢廔 廒匿救廔裒 廒缶 庥帢廔 彃用晅 廒庣怷. 怷帠巹帢彖 帠怷彃缶 廔裕 庰怷彖彃彖怷彖 帢廔怷彃 帠庰彖峟庛帢庣 弮帢庛庢峸彖, 廒彖帤帢 廔庰峟怷彖帢 廒彖 彃用煙怷庣庥彃 庥帢廔 峟彖庢彖 廒怷弇庰弇怷庣帢.
Cf. Olympiodorus in Plat. 勞怷娶眶. p. 112 J., 6.16. 23 N.
4. Quint. 3.1.8: nam primus post eos quos poetae tradiderunt movisse aliqua circa rhetoricen Empedocles dicitur. artium autem scriptores antiquissimi Corax et Tisias Siculi, quos insecutus est vir eiusdem insulae Gorgias Leontinus, Empedoclis, ut traditur, discipulus - v. infra fr. 10.
5. Schol. Iamblichi V. P. p. 198 N. p. 150.10 D.: 廒庥 庛帢帠怷 廒反徆帢怷 廒 帤庣帢弇庰庥庣庥峸, 廔＋帢 帤峟 廒 彃用煙怷庣庥峸繚 峇庣巹帢 帠廔區 庥帢廔 怷帠巹帢 庥帢廔 彃僇銜諫 廒弮庰帤怷庥弇峟怷 怷彃 庛帢帠怷庰巹怷 弮帢庛庢帢巹.
6. Aristot. Soph. el. 33 183b29: 怷廒 帤廔 彖彃缶 庰廔帤怷庥庣弮怷彃缶誕庰 帢帢弇帢帣彖庰 帢廔 怷弇弇彃僇 怷廒煎諺 廒庥 帤庣帢帤怷彃 庥帢廔 弮峟怷 怷帢帠帢帠彖彖 怷廔 庢廔徆峸庥帢庣, 峇庰庣巹帢 弮廔統 弮庰廔 怷彃羊 怷, 帢弮帢怷 帤廔 弮庰廔 庰庣巹帢彖, 庰帤怷 帤廔 弮庰廔 怷彃羊怷彖 庥帢廔 怷弇弇怷廔 怷弇弇廔 彖庰彖庢彖帢庣 弮峟庢, 帤庣庰 怷廔帤廔統 庛帢弮帢廔裕 廒庰庣彖 庣 弇彃庛怷 廔棒 峟彖庢彖... (36) 庥帢廔 帠廔區 彃僇 庰廔 怷廔磁 廒庣庣庥怷廔磁 弇帠怷 弮庣庛帢彖怷彖彖 廔弮怷巹帢 庣 廒缶 廒 帢巹帤庰庣 彃 怷帠巹怷 帢帠弮帢庰巹彄. 弇帠怷 帠廔區 怷廒 弮廔統 彃用煙怷庣庥怷, 怷廒 帤廔 廒庢庣庥怷彃羊 廒帤巹帤怷帢彖 廒庥弮帢彖庛峎彖庰庣彖, 庰廒區 怷廔 弇庰庣峎庥庣 廒弮巹庰庣彖 彄峸庛庢帢彖 廒庥峎庰怷庣 怷彃羊 廒弇弇峸弇彖 弇帠怷. 帤庣庰 帢庰彃帢 弮峟彖, 廒庰彖怷 帤宎 廒缶 廒 帤庣帤帢庥帢弇巹帢 怷彃 弮帢彖庛峎彖怷庣 帢宎 帢廔彃僇. 怷廔 帠廔區 峟彖庢彖, 廒弇弇廔 廔 廒廔 彃 峟彖庢 帤庣帤彖庰 帢庣帤庰庰庣彖 廔庰弇峎弮帣帢彖怷彖, 廔甩庰 廒彖 庰廒 庣 廒庣峸弮庢彖 峎庥彖 帢帢帤庰庣彖 廒廔 廔 弮庢帤峟彖 怷彖庰彃彖 怷廔磁 帤帢, 庰廒剿帢 庥怷怷弮庣庥廔棒 弮廔統 弮廔 帤庣帤峎庥怷庣, 弮庢帤宎 廔庛庰彖 帤彖峸庰帢庣 怷巹庤庰庛帢庣 廔 怷庣帢彃羊帢, 帤怷巹庢 帤廔 怷弇弇廔 帠峟彖庢 帢彖怷帤帢彃僇 廔怷帤庢弮峎彖. 怷廔怷 帠廔區 帣庰帣怷峸庛庢庥庰 弮廔統 廔裒 廔棒 庰巹帢彖, 峟彖庢彖 帤宎 怷廔 帢峟帤庥庰彖. 庥帢廔 庰廔 弮廔統 彃僇 彃用煙怷庣庥彃僇 廔彃庰 怷弇弇廔 庥帢廔 帢弇帢庣廔 廔 弇庰帠弮庰彖帢, 庰廔 帤廔 怷彃 弇弇怷帠巹庤庰庛帢庣 帢彖庰弇彃剿 怷廔帤廔統 庰廒棲怷弮庰彖 庰怷彖 廒弇弇o 弇峟帠庰庣彖.
2 帢帢帠帢帠彖彖 A 怷帢帠彖彖 D 8 廒庣庥怷廔磁 D 11 廒廔 峟彖庢 D
Cf. Plato Menex. 235D, Isocr. 13.12 sq. De verbis interpretandis P. Wendland, Quaestiones rhetoricae (Universitatis Gott. Progr. 1914), Susemihl, Neue Platonische Forschungen (Univers. Gryph. Progr. 1898) 4 sq., Kroll, RhM 66.168. Ceterum de sophistarum institutionis ratione Plato qu怷que agit Soph. 232C sq.
7. Schol. in Isocr. 13.19: 庥帢廔 廔區 庥帢弇怷弮峟彖帢 峟彖帢 帠峎帢庣 怷弇弮峸帢彖庰: T庣巹帢彖 庥帢廔 帢庥帢 弇峟帠庰庣 怷廔磁 峉帢庥怷巹怷 怷帠巹帢彖庰庥帢廔 帢弮帢怷彖, 怷廒 彃剿怷庣 彃用煙怷庣庥廔區 峟彖帢 廒帠帢帢彖.
Philod. I p. 211, col. XXIX a 17 廔區 廒庥帤庰帤怷弮峟彖帢 廔宎 帢廔彃僇 (scil. 彃僇 弮庰帠峎弇彖 怷庣彃僇) . . 峟彖帢.
8. Cicero inv. 2.2.6-7: ac veteres quidem scriptores artis usque a principe illo atque inventore Tisia repetitos unum in locum conduxit Aristoteles et nominatim cuiusque praecepta magna conquisita cura perspicue conscripsit atque enodatadiligenter exposuit ac tantum inventoribus ipsis suavitate et brevitate dicendi praestitit, ut nemo illorum praecepta ex ipsorum libris cognoscat, sed omnes qui, quod illi praecipiant, velint intellegere, ad hunc quasi ad quendam multo commodiorem explicatorem revertantur. atque hic quidem ipse et sese ipsum nobis et eos, qui ante se fuerant, in medio posuit, ut ceteros et se ipsum per se cognosceremus.
Hunc Aristotelis librum in quo exposuit dicendi artes omnium superiorum legisse se adfirmat Antonius apud Cic. de orat. 2.38.160. 廒庣怷弮廔 彃僇 彃用煙彖 vocatur a Diog. Laert. 2.104 (v. infra s. n. 庰帤怷). 怷庣庣庥廔區 庰彖怷弇怷帠巹帢 inde memorare videtur Philod. rhet. II p. 110, fr. XIX 8 sq.
9. Cic. Brut. 12.46-48: itaque ait Aristoteles, cum sublatis in Sicilia tyrannis res privatae longo intervallo iudiciis repeterentur, tum primum, quod esset acuta illa gens et controversa natura, artem et praecepta Siculos Coracem et Tisiam conscripsisse: nam antea neminem solitum via nec arte, sed accurate tamen et discripte plerosque dicere, scriptasque fuisse et paratas a Protagora rerum illustrium disputationes, quae nunc communes appellantur loci. quod idem fecisse Gorgiam, cum singularum rerum laudes vituperationesque conscripsisset, quod iudicaret, hoc oratoris esse maxume proprium, rem augere posse laudando vituperandoque rursus adfligere. huic Antiphontem Rhamnusium similia quaedam habuisse conscripta, qu怷 neminem umquam melius ullam oravisse capitis causam, cum se ipse defenderet, se audiente, locuples auctor scripsit Thucydides. nam Lysiam primo profiteri solitum artem esse dicendi, deinde, quod Theodorus esset in arte subtilior, in orationibus autem ieiunior, orationes eum scribere aliis coepisse, artem removisse. similiter Isocratem primo artem dicendi esse negavisse, scribere autem aliis solitum orationes, quibus in iudiciis uterentur, sed cum ex eo, quia quasi committeret contra legem qua <vetabatur, ne> quis iudicio circumveniretur, saepe ipse in iudicium vocaretur, orationes aliis destitisse scribere totumque se ad artes componendas transtulisse.
3 controversia 6 de scripto (quod F. Blass tuetur Att. Ber. I2 27 nach einem schriftlichen Konzept) 21 quo
10. Quint. Inst. 3.1.8-13: nam primus post e怷s, qu怷s poetae tradiderunt, movisse aliqua circa rhetoricen Empedocles dicitur, artium autem scriptores antiquissimi Corax et Tisias Siculi, quos insecutus est vir eiusdem insulae Gorgias Leontinus, Empedoclis, ut traditur, discipulus.
is beneficio longissimae aetatis (nam centum et novem vixit annos) cum multis simul floruit, ideoque et illorum, de quibus supra dixi, fuit aemulus et ultra Socraten usque duravit. Thrasymachus Chalcedonius cum hoc et Prodicus Cius et Abderites Protagoras, a quo decem milibus denariorum didicisse artem, quam edidit, Euathlus dicitur, et Hippias Elius, et quem Palameden Plato appellat, Alcidamas Elaites. Antiphon qu怷que, <qui> et orationem primus omnium scripsit et nihilominus artem et ipse composuit et pro se dixisse optime est creditus. etiam Polycrates et Theodorus Byzantius horum primi communis locos tractasse dicuntur Protagoras, Gorgias, adfectus Prodicus, Hippias et idem Protagoras et Thrasymachus (13) his successere multi, sed clarissimus Gorgiae auditor Isocrates (quamquam de praeceptore eius inter auctores non convenit, nos tamen Aristoteli credimus).
12 et artem ipse A 15 adfectus om. BP 16 Prodicus Hippias et idem Protagoras Trasimacus A Prodicus et Thrasymachus BP: 釵怷娶娶. a b 17 auditor Ambrosianus III Laurentianus: auditorum ABP 19 tamen A: autem BP
Vide praeterea, quae de singulis auctoribus infra adnotata exstant. Cave autem, ne puram Aristotelis putes hanc traditionem.
11. Cic. Brut. 8.30: ut intellectum est, quantam vim haberet accurata et facta quodam modo oratio, tum etiam magistri dicendi multi subito exstiterunt. tum Leontinus Gorgias, Thrasymachus Calchedonius, Protagoras Abderites, Prodicus Cius, Hippias Elius in honore magno fuit aliique multi temp怷ribus eisdem docere se profitebantur, arrogantibus sane verbis, quem ad modum causa inferior ita enim loquebantur dicendo fieri superior posset (32) exstitit igitur iam senibus illis, quos paulo ante diximus, Isocrates, cuius domus cunctae Graeciae quasi ludus quidam patuit atque officina dicendi, magnus orator et perfectus magister, quamquam forensi luce caruit intraque parietes aluit eam gloriam, quam nemo meo quidem iudicio est postea consecutus. is et ipse scripsit multa praeclare et docuit alios.
12. Plato Apol. Socr. 19E: 庥帢廔 怷彃羊 帠峟 弮怷庣 帤怷庥庰彃 庥帢弇廔裕 庰廒僇諄敖, 庰廒 庣 怷廒煙 宎 庰廒舒 帢庣帤庰庰庣彖 廒彖庛怷 廔甩庰 怷帠巹帢 庰 廔 庰怷彖彃彖怷 庥帢廔 f帤庣庥怷 廔 庰彃怷 庥帢廔 廒裒巹帢 廔 弇庰彃怷. 怷彖 帠廔區 廒庥帢怷, 廔 廒彖帤庰, 怷廒煙 宎 廒廔僇 廒唸蕊彖 庰廒區 廒庥峎庢彖 彃僇 弇庰彖 怷彃羊 彖峟怷, 怷廒煙 廒徆庰庣 彃僇 廒帢彃僇 怷弇庣彃僇 怷彃庥帢 徆彖庰彃彖帢庣, 彄 廒彖 帣怷弇彖帢庣, 怷怷 庰巹庛怷庣 廔區 廒庥庰巹彖彖 徆彖怷巹帢 廒怷弇庣彖帢 巹庣 徆彖庰彃彖帢庣 峸弮帢帢 帤庣帤彖帢 庥帢廔 峎庣彖 廔裒 庰廒匿棒倀諄敖. 廒庰廔 庥帢廔 廒弇弇怷 廒彖峸 廒庣 峎庣怷 廒彖庛峎帤庰 怷, 廔彖 廒帠廔 廒＋庛弮庢彖 廒庣帤庢弮怷彃缶誕帢 (20B) 巹, 廒缶 帤宎 廒帠, 庥帢廔 怷帤帢廔裒 庥帢廔 怷 帤庣帤峎庥庰庣; 廔庢彖怷, 廒庢, 廔 峉庥帢庰, 峎庣怷, 峟彖庰 弮彖彃僇.
13. Dionys. Hal. ad Amm. I p.258.17 U. R.: 怷彃羊怷 帤廔 (i. e. Aristotelis confutationem) 庰怷巹庢庥帢, 帣峟弇庣庰 廒弮弮帢彃庰, 彃 庰 廒弇庢庛庰巹帢 怷彖怷怷弮庰彖怷, 廒彖 廒廔 帢彖廔裒 怷廒棒諺樁敖 帤庰彃彖 峎帠弮帢怷 廒徆庰峎庤庰庛帢庣, 庥帢廔 彃 廒峎彖彖 彃僇 庰廔 怷廔磁 怷弇庣庣庥怷彃羊 弇帠怷 廒怷帤帢庥彖 峎庣怷, 廒舒諄 弮廔 怷彃缶裘 廔怷弇峎帣庣彖, 廔庣 峎彖帢 庰庣庰巹弇庢庰彖 廒 庰庣帢庢庣庥廔 庣弇怷怷巹帢 廔 彃用煙怷庣庥廔 帢帢帠帠峟弇弮帢帢 庥帢廔 怷廔庰 怷廒 庰廔 庰帤怷彖 庥帢廔 帢弮帢怷彖 庥帢廔 廒彖庣彃僇誕帢 怷帤彃 廒徆庣怷彖 怷廔帤廔統 庰廔怷彖 怷廔庰 廒裒怷庥峎庢 庥帢廔 廒彖帢徆庣弮峟彖庢 庥帢廔 廒弇庥庣帤峎弮帢 怷廔庰 怷廒 怷怷庣 弮帣庣帢彖庰 怷彃 廒彖帤峎庣 帢帢帠帠庰弇弮峎彖 庰彖庣庥彃僇 帠帠帢庰彃 庥帢廔 廒帠彖庣帢廔 弇帠彖 彃用煙怷庣庥彃僇, 怷廒 庰廔 庰怷帤峟庥庢彖 庥帢廔 峖巹弇庣庥怷彖 庥帢廔 廒裒帢彃怷彖 庥帢廔 庢庣帤怷彖, 彃肢庰庰巹帤庢彖 庰 庥帢廔 庥怷彃羊帠怷彖 庥帢廔 廒區巹彖庢彖, 怷廔帤宎 廒彖 帢廔廔裒 廔 庢弮怷庛峟彖庢 ... 怷怷彃羊怷 廒帠峟彖庰怷 怷彃 廒裒怷庥峎怷 庰 庥帢廔 廒裒帢巹怷 庥怷弮怷弮庰彖怷 帢帢帠帠峟弇弮帢庣彖, 庰廒 弮廔 廔區 廒庣怷峟弇怷 峟彖帢 廒徆峟弮帢庛庰彖.
11 峖巹弇庣怷彖 12 怷廔帤宎 廒彖: 怷廔庰
14. Diog. Laert. 9.8.54 (de Protag怷ra): 彃剿怷彖 帤廔 彃僇 弇帠彖 廒帢怷彃 廒彖峟帠彖 廔裕 庰廔 庛庰彃僇 ... 廒彖峟帠彖 帤宎 廒庛峸彖庢庣彖 廒彖 彃 廔庣巹帤怷 怷廒匿睡脊噫 廒 廔＋ 庣彖廔紮 廒彖 彃 庰帠帢庥弇庰巹帤怷. 廒弇弇怷庣 廒彖 庥庰巹彃, 弮帢庛庢怷彃 廔棒 彖廔棒 帢廔彃 峸帢彖怷 廒帢帠怷 怷彃 庰怷帤怷. 庥帢庢帠庢庰 帤宎 帢廔怷彃 庛帤怷 怷弇庤峸弇怷, 庰廒煙 彃僇 庰帢庥怷巹彖. 廒庣怷峟弇庢 帤宎 E廔帢庛弇彖 庢庣彖.
6 De Euathlo cf. sequentia.
15. Diog. Laert. 9.8.56: 弇峟帠庰帢庣 帤峟 怷庰 帢廔廔裕 廒帢庣怷彃缶誕帢 廔裕 弮庣庛廔裕 廔帢庛弇怷彖 廔裕 弮帢庛庢峸彖, 廒庥庰巹彖怷 庰廒區彖怷繚 廒弇弇宎 怷廔帤峟 彖庰彖巹庥庢庥帢<>, 庰廒區庰彃彖繚 廒弇弇宎 廒帠廔 弮廔統 廒彖 彖庣庥峸, 廔庣 廒帠廔 廒彖巹庥庢帢, 弇帢帣庰彃彖 弮庰 廒帤庰庣繚 廒廔匿 帤廔 , 廔庣 .
Ex alio fonte esse sumpta neque eandem causam intellegi posse, quae supra indicatur (廒庣怷峟弇庢 帤宎 廔帢庛弇彖 庢庣彖) statuit Rabe P. S. XI. De Protagora Euathlum in ius vocante cf. Apul. flor. 18 p. 30 K, Gell. 5.10, Syriani in Hermogenem II p. 42.2 R, nec sane narratio ita dispersa saeculo demum p. C. secundo potest esse orta. 帤巹庥庢 廔廔紮 弮庣庛怷彃 inter Protagorae scripta memoratur a Diog. Laert. 9.55.
16. Aristotelis, qui Coracem in privatis litibus apud iudices oravisse tradiderat, doctrinae vestigia conservantur, non pura quidem, apud Sopatrum in Hermogenis commentario VW V 6, 14: 彃僇 帠廔區 帢彖彖巹帤彖 廒彖 帢彃 弇庰庣 帠庰彖怷弮峟彖彖 廒彖帢帠庥帢巹 廒 彃用煙怷庣庥廔 廔裒 廒弇庰庛庰巹帢彖 怷帤峎庤怷帢 庥帢廔 廒彖帢彖巹帢 怷廔帢 帢彃 帢彖彖巹庣彖 廒帠庥弇庢弮峎 庰 廒缶 庥帢廔 廒庣庥巹彖帤彖怷彖 帠巹彖庰庛帢庣. 廒彖 帤廔 峉庣庥庰弇巹彄 弇峟帠庰帢庣 峖峎弇帢庣彖 帤庢弮帢帠帠庣庥廔裕 弇帠怷彖 庰廒區庰彃彖 庥帢廔 廔帢帠帢帠峟庛帢庣 廔 弇彃庛怷 庣庛帢彖庢庣, 廔甩庰 庥帢廔 庰廒區 帢彖彖巹帤帢 廒弇庛庰彃彖繚 弮庰廔 帤廔 帢彃羊帢 帢徆 彃剿怷彖 峎彖彖 彖庰峸帢怷 帤庣帤帢庥帢弇巹帢彖 庰廔 彃用煙怷庣庥彃. 怷廒 帠廔區 廔 帢廔怷彃 廒庣庢帤庰怷彖庰 廔棒 峟彖庢彖 廔＋ 廒弮庰庣巹彄 庣彖廔 庥帢廔 廒庣弮庰弇庰巹彄 弮庰彖怷庣 廒庰峸帤庰怷彖, 庥帢廔 怷廔怷 <l. 怷廔> 弮廔統 怷廔 弮庰廔 弇帠怷 庥帢廔 帢廒區巹帢 怷廔帤廔 峟彖庢 庣彖. 怷怷 帤廔 怷彃 帢庥怷 T庣巹帢 帠峟帠怷彖庰 弮帢庛庢峸, 庰廔 怷廔 弇峟帠庰帢庣 怷庣怷彃羊彖 庣. T庣巹帢彖 彖庛峟庛帢庣 彃 帢庥庣 庣弇巹帢 帤帢弮峎, 廒﹡諄翁睡 廒彖 廒彖 帤庣庥帢庢巹彃 廒帠彖庣庤弮庰彖怷 廔棒 庢彖 彖巹庥庢彖 彖庣庥峸庰庣庰彖, 廔彖怷 帤峟 庰帣峟怷 怷彃 帢庥怷 怷廔 怷彃庰庣 廒彖 帤庣庥帢庢巹彃 廒廔 彃 彃 庰弇庰彃 怷彃 帢庥怷 庥庰帤彄僇諄敖 廔區 廒帢帠帠庰弇巹帢. 廒帠峎帢怷 怷廔彖 帢廔廔裕 廔 帢徆 峟怷 庥弇.
Sequitur Coracis et Tisiae de mercede litis historiola, nota iam Sexto Empirico adv. math. II 96, extans eadem apud omnes Prolegomenon et Commentariorum scriptores, quam historiolam alii auctores (v. s.) de Protagora et Euathlo narraverant. Deinde pergit Sopater (p. 7.9):
彃弇怷 怷廔彖 庰廒區 怷怷 怷弇廔磁 彃 峟彖庢 帠峟帠怷彖庰, 庥帢廔 怷帠巹帢 廔 庰怷彖彃彖怷 庥帢廔 庰帣庰巹帢彖 廒弇庛廔樁 廒庛峸彖庢庣 廔棒 峟彖庢彖 廔棒 帠帠帢庰彃帢彖 帢宎帢廔怷彃 廒庥弮庣庰彖 庥帢廔 帢廔廔裒 廒峟帢彖 怷峟庛庢庥庰 庥帢廔 弮庰宎 帢廔廔裕 廒彖庣彃僇 廔 彃疥敖樁諄諫庣怷, 廔 怷庥帤巹帤怷 帤庣帤峎庥帢弇怷, 弇峟帠庰帢庣 峟彖庢彖 帠峎帢庣, 弮庰廔 帢彃羊帢 帤廔 廒裒怷庥峎庢 廔 彃用晅.
Eandem Coracis, Gorgiae, Antiphontis, Isocratis successionem habes, quam Cicero l. l. exhibet. Neque ignorat Sopater (quod Aristoteles observaverat) antiquas illas artes ad genus iudiciale pertinuisse (ibid. p. 7.18 sq.), addens in fine (p. 7.31) 帢廔帢庣 弮峟彖怷庣 帢廒 帤庣庥帢彖庣庥帢廔 峟彖帢庣 怷廔帤帢弮怷彃 庤怷彖帢庣. Vide ad rem excerpta quoque brevissima P. S. p. 60.2-7.
Mixtam Aristotelis cum altera (v. i.) traditionem satis pueriliter quidem Troilus in Proleg怷menis W VI 48.26 sq. = P. S. 5 p. 52.3 sq. exhibet: 彃峟彖 庥帢廔 峟弇彖 峉庣庥庰弇巹帢 帠庰帠彖帢庣 帢彖彖怷庣, 廒怷彖 帤峟 庣彖帢 帢庥帢 彃 廔彖弮帢庣 帢帢帤彖帢庰怷彖帢, 廔 廒怷巹庰庣 廔棒 帤庣怷巹庥庢庣彖 彃僇 怷弇弇彃僇 帢宎 帢廔怷彃. 弮庰帢庰怷庢 帤廔 彃 帢彖彖巹帤怷 庰廒區 帤庢弮怷庥帢巹帢彖, 廒帢 帠峎, 廔＋ 怷廔 帤彖帢帢庣 庰巹庛庰庣彖 廒帢彖帢 廔裕 帤彃弮怷彖 庥帢庛峎庰 廒彖帢 彃僇 峎彖彖彖, 廒弮庢帢彖彄剿怷 廔 怷怷巹弮庣帢, 廒舒諄 帤庣宎 帢廔彃僇 廒庰弇庥庢帢庣 廔裕 廒庥怷帢廔棒 廔裒 庰廔彖怷庣帢彖, 庰廒剿帢 廔棒 怷庥帢帢庥庰峸彖, 廒舒諄 廒彖峟弇彃 帢廒區巹帢彖 弇怷彃羊帢彖 帢廔彖, 庰廒剿帢 廔棒 怷庥帢峎帢庣彖, 庰廒區帣怷弇廔棒 庥帢廔 廒廔棒 庥帢廔 怷怷巹弮庣怷彖 怷廔帢彖 廒廔 廔棒 庥帢峎帢庣彖, 廔棒 帤廔 庥帢峎帢庣彖 庣弇廔棒 彃僇 帢庛峟彖彖 廒庥庛庰庣彖, 怷廔磁 帤廔 廒帠彃僇諄救 廒帤庰庣徆庣彖 庥帢廔 巹庣彖 彃僇 庣弇彃剿 帤庣庢帠庢庛峟彖彖, 庰廒剿帢 廔棒 帢峟庥帣帢庣彖 廒帤庰庣徆庣彖 怷廔帢彖 怷彃 庥庣彖怷弮峟彖怷 帣巹怷. 廒庥庰庣 帠峎, 廔＋, <庰廒> 峟廔 廒彖廔 庥帢廔 弮彖彃 廒帠庥弇峸弮帢庣 怷庣峸帢庛帢庣 廔棒 庥帢庢帠怷巹帢彖 <廒庥怷彃>怷, 廔 庰帠彖 廒怷弇庛峸庰帢庣, 庥帢廔 帤庣廔 怷彃羊怷 廔棒 帢峟庥帣帢庣彖 廒庰彖庢庰, 怷彃羊 帤宎 廒庣弇帠怷 廒彖帢庥庰帢弇帢巹庣彖 彃僇 庰廒區庢弮峟彖彖 帤庣廔 怷彃, 廔＋ 廔 (廔 廔＋ ll.) 庰廒匿磁, 怷廔磁 帤庣庥帢廔區 怷弇弇廔 廒庥怷帢彖帢 庰廒區 弇峸庛庢彖 廒弇庛庰彃彖.
Sequitur de Coracis Tisiaeque lite historia, Gorgias eloquentiam Athenas transfert. Troilo auctore septem Corax orationis partes distinxerat: 怷怷巹弮庣怷彖, 怷庥帢帢庥庰峸彖, 怷庥帢峎帢庣彖, 庥帢峎帢庣彖, 廒帠彃僇諄救, 帢峟庥帣帢庣彖, 廒巹弇怷帠怷彖, eaeque partes ad solum quadrant iudiciale genus dicendi (de singulis rebus v. infra s. v. 帢徆).
Altera autem est in Prolegomenis rhetoricis traditio, qua Corax orator in contionali genere versatus inducitur, id quod breviter Ioannes Doxapatri in commentario ad Aphthonii Pr怷gymnasmata exp怷nit W II 140 = P. S. p. 150.12 R. 廒庣 帤峟 庥帢廔 廒宎廒峟帢 廒救怷巹帢 帤庰彃徆帢庣 彃剿怷彖 廔 弮帣怷弇庰庣庥廔裕 彃僇 廒弇弇彖繚 弇峟帠庰帢庣 帠廔區 庥帢廔 帢庥帢, 廔庣 廔 彃 彃用煙怷庣庥彃 廒帠帢 庰廒區 彃剿 怷峸帠帢帠庰 怷彃 廒彖庛怷庣, 彃 弮帣怷弇庰庣庥彃 庰廒棒棒舒 峸帢庛帢庣 彃. De eadem re satis loquaciter Prolegomena artis rhetoricae an怷nyma W VI 11 = P. S. p. 24.8: 庰廒區庰帤峟徆帢彖怷 怷巹彖彖 彃剿怷彖 廒峎彖彖 帢廒 峉峎庥怷帢庣, 弇庣 彃 峉庣庥庰弇巹帢 (scil. 廔棒 彃用煙怷庣庥峸彖). . . . 帢廔庢 . . . 廔廔 峟弇彖怷 庥帢廔 廒團倔彖怷, 峎彖彖彖 廔弮怷峎彖, 廒帢彖彖庰庛庢 . . . (p. 25.3) 怷廔 怷廔彖 帢弇庰彃剿 庥帢廔 庛庢庣帤彃剿 廒怷弮峟彖彖 彃僇 峉帢庥怷巹彖 庥帢廔 怷庰怷弮峟彖彖 庣廔 廒弇庰庛庰巹彃 廒帢弇弇帢帠彃彖帢庣 彃 庣庥彄剿 帢庢 帤怷弇庰巹帢, 庰廔磁 廔棲 廒弮帢 庥帢廔 廒弇庰庛峟庣怷 . . . 廒弇庰庛峟庰 彃 帢彖彖巹帤怷 怷廔磁 峉帢庥怷巹怷. 廔 怷廔彖 彃僇 峉帢庥怷巹彖 帤彃弮怷 . . . 廔棒 帤庰怷庰巹帢彖 廒庰庣彖 廒峎彖彖 廒帣怷弇峸庛庢, 帢徆 帤峟 庣 廔彖怷弮帢, 峉帢庥怷庣怷 廔 帠峟彖怷, 庥怷峸帢, 廔＋ 廔 帤彃弮怷 廒峎庛弮庢怷彖 庥帢廔 廒帢庥怷彖 峟庥庰 彄僇割樁, 庥帢廔 廒彖彖怷峸帢, 廔庣 弇帠怷 廒巹彖, 彄 彃甩庛弮巹庤庰帢庣 廒彖庛怷 怷, 廒庥庢庰 帤庣廔 弇帠怷 廒廔 廔 怷帢 廔裕 帤彃弮怷彖 庥帢廔 怷峟庰庣彖 庥帢廔 廒怷峟庰庣彖. 庰廒區庰弇庛廔樁 怷廔彖 廒彖 彃 廒庥庥弇庢巹彄 . . . 廒反徆帢怷 弇帠怷庣 庰怷彖 庛庰帢庰庣庥怷彃 庥帢廔 庥怷弇帢庥庰庣庥怷彃 廔棒 廔弇庢庣彖 庥帢廔 廔 庛怷帣彃僇棒舜 庥帢帢帢彃形諄敖 怷彃 帤峸弮怷, 廒庣彖帢 庥帢廔 怷怷巹弮庣帢 廒庥峎弇庰庰, 弮庰廔 帤廔 廔 庥帢帢帢彃形諄敖 庥帢廔 庥帢帢庣帠峎帢庣 廔裕 帤彃弮怷彖 廒反徆帢怷, 庰廔 廔形 廒帤庰庣, 弮帣怷弇庰庰庣彖 彃 帤峸弮彃 庥帢廔 弇峟帠庰庣彖 廔＋ 廒彖 帤庣庢帠峸庰庣 庥帢廔 弮庰廔 帢彃羊帢 廒彖帢庥庰帢弇帢庣怷彃羊庛帢庣 庥帢廔 廒彖帢弮庣弮彖彄庥庰庣彖 廒彖 彖弮彃 庰廔 彃僇 庛帢峎彖彖 庥帢廔 庰廒區 彖怷怷彖 庥帢廔 廔宎 廔庣彖 廒帠庰庣彖 廔 弇庰庛峟彖帢 彃 帤峸弮彃. 庥帢廔 廔 弮廔統 彃剿帢 廒庥峎弇庰庰 怷怷巹弮庣帢, 廔 帤廔 帤庰庰帢 廒庥峎弇庰庰彖 廒帠彃僇諄救, 廔 帤廒 巹帢 廒庥峎弇庰庰彖 廒庣弇帠怷. Sequitur de Tisiae discipuli lite historia. Deinde pergitur (W p. 14 = P. S. p. 27.11 sq.): 峟帢彖 廒庣 庥庰峎弇帢庣怷彖, 彃剿 廒彖 廒庛峸彖帢庣 廒及睡樁救庰彖 廒 彃用煙怷庣庥峸 . . . 庰怷彖巹彖庢 弇庣 庥帢廔 帢廔廔 彃 峉庣庥庰弇巹帢. 帢庢彖 廒彃棒睡圖帢彖 峎弇帢庣 廒庛庢彖帢彃怷庣. 弇庰弮怷彖 帤廔 廒庢庥庰 怷廒 庰怷彖彃彖怷庣 廔裒 怷彃羊 廒帠庰巹怷彖帢 庰帣庰怷彖帢庣 廔裒 廒庛庢彖帢巹怷 帤庣廔 怷帠巹怷 怷彃 彃用晅怷怷 弮弮帢巹帢彖 帢廒區怷彃缶誕庰. 廔 帤廔 怷帠巹帢 廒弇庛廔樁 庰廒區 廔區 廒庛峸彖帢 彃用煙怷庰庰庣彖 廒怷帤帢庰 帤庣宎 廒彖 廒巹庥庰o 庰巹帢彖, 庥帢廔 怷怷彃羊怷彖 庰庣彃彖 彃 彃用晅怷庣 庥峎弇弇怷 庰廔 廔棒 峎庣彖, 廔甩庰 峎帢 廒庛峸彖帢 庥庣彖彃帢庣 庰廔 廔棒 廒庥帢庣彖 廔棒 帢廔怷彃. 彖庰弮庰彖怷庣 怷廔彖 廔區 弮廔統 廒﹡樁倔帢 彃僇 廒庣帤庰巹徆庰彖 廒庥峎弇怷彖 廒怷峎, 怷廔磁 帤廔 弇帠怷 廒庥峎弇怷彖 弇帢弮峎帤帢.
Similiter W III 610. W II 119 = P. S. p. 126 R. W 11 = P. S. p. 269. W II 683 = P. S. p. 60. W II 91 = P. S. p. 91. W VII 6 = P. S. p. 189. Hausit inde etiam Ioannes Sardianus p. 50.12-19 R. Ad Platonis Gorgiam adludere videntur (464 C) 弇帠怷庣 庛庰帢庰庣庥怷廔 庥帢廔 庥怷弇帢庥庰庣庥怷巹, quorum memor est etiam Longinus in rhet. p. 190, 15 H. 怷庣庰彃庛帢庣 帤廔 怷彃羊怷 廔 怷彃 庛庰帢庰庣庥怷彃 庰 庥帢廔 庥怷弇帢庥庰庣庥怷彃 廔彖弮帢庣.
ln hac traditione, qua Corax orator in contionem prodierat, non septem, sed tres orationis partes 怷怷巹弮庣帢, 廒帠彃僇諄舜, 廒巹弇怷帠怷庣 distinguntur, quod ipsum quoque ad rem admodum quadrat, quartum 帤庣峸帠庢庣 interdum ex confusione rerum additur, quintum 帢峟庥帣帢庣.
Ad rem cf. Diodori 11.87.5 de rebus Siculorum: 廒庰弇帢庤庰 帠廔區 帤庢弮帢帠帠彃僇 弇彃庛怷 庥帢廔 庥怷帢彖彃僇, 庥帢廔 弇帠怷 帤庰庣彖庢 廔廔 彃僇 彖庰峟彖 廒庥庰彃怷. Vide A. Gercke, Hermae 32 (1897) 344 sq., P. Hamberger, Die rednerische Disposition in der alten 峇峟彖庢 彃用煙怷庣庥峸 (Rhet. Studien 2, Paderborn 1914) 25 sq. Kowalski, De artis rhet. origg. quaestiones sel. 44 sq. De artibus rhetoricis e Sicilia in Graeciam translatis generaliter loquitur Iamblichus Vit. Pyth. 166.
17. Theophrast. (Usener Kl. Schr. I 191): 廒庥 怷彃 峟弇怷 庰怷峎怷繚 峟彖庢彖 弇帠彖 帢徆 峉帢庥怷庣怷 庰廔帢怷.
Cf. P. S. p. 126.5, p. 171.19, p. 150.13 R., Sudae lex. s. v. 帢徆.
18. Cic. de orat. 1.20.91: neminem scriptorem artis ne mediocriter quidem disertum fuisse dicebat, cum repeteret usque a Corace nescioquo et Tisia, quos artis illius inventores et principes fuisse constaret.
19. Quint. inst. 2.17.5: quidam naturalem esse rhetoricen volunt (7) deinde adiciunt illas verborum cavillati怷nes, nihil, quod ex arte fiat, ante artem fuisse: atqui dixisse homines pro se et in alios semper: doctores artis sero et circa Tisian et Coraca primum repertos.
20. Excerpta Cod. Par. 3032, P. S. p. 296.25: 峇庣巹帢 庥帢廔 帢徆, 怷廒舜庣彖庰 廒庰彃羊怷彖 廔棒 彃用煙怷庣庥峸彖.
21. Schol. Hom. Town. Il. I 443 v. supra A III 8.
22. Sopatros W V 7.10: 怷帠巹帢 廔 庰怷彖彃彖怷 庥帢廔 庰帣庰巹帢彖 廒弇庛廔樁 廒庛峸彖庢庣 廔棒 峟彖庢彖 廔棒 帠帠帢庰彃帢彖 帢宎 帢廔怷彃 (帢庥怷 scil.) 廒庥弮庣庰彖 庥帢廔 帢廔廔裒 廒峟帢彖 怷峟庛庢庥庰 庥帢廔 弮庰宎 帢廔廔裕 廒彖庣彃僇 廔 P帢弮彖怷庣怷, 廔 怷庥帤巹帤怷 帤庣帤峎庥帢弇怷, 弇峟帠庰帢庣 峟彖庢彖 帠峎帢庣, 弮庰廔 帢彃羊帢 帤廔 廒裒怷庥峎庢 廔 彃用晅. 庥帢廔 彄剿帢庣 弮廔統 帢廔帢庣 帤庢弮帢帠帠庣庥帢廔 峟彖帢庣 庰廒區巹彖. quae secuntur, infra (A V 42) epressa exstant.
Cf. Iamblichus, Vit. Pyth. 166.
23. Paus. 6.17.8: 怷廔怷 廔 怷帠巹帢 帢廔裒 弮廔統 廒缶 峓帢弮帢彖巹帤怷, 弇峟帠庰帢庣 帤廔 廒彖帢帢庛帢庣 弮庰弇峟庢彖 弇帠彖 彃剿怷, 廒弮庰弇庢弮峟彖庢彖 庰 廒 廒帢彖 庥帢廔 廒 弇峸庛庢彖 廔弇巹帠怷 帤庰彃彖 廒用睡諫帢彖 廒彖庛怷庣. 庰廔帤怷庥庣弮彃帢庣 帤廔 怷帠巹帢彖 弇帠彖 廒彖庰庥帢 廒彖 庰 帢彖庢帠庰庣 彃 廔弇弮庣庥彃 帢庣 庥帢廔 廒庣庥弮庰彖怷彖 庥帢廔 庰帣庰巹帢彖 廔弮怷彃 峇庣巹彄 帢宎 廒庛庢彖帢巹怷.
24. Diod. bibl. 12.53.1: 廒廔 帤廔 怷彖 庥帢廔 廔棒 峉庣庥庰弇巹帢彖 庰怷彖彃彖怷庣, 峓帢弇庥庣帤峟彖 弮廔統 廔彖庰 廒怷庣庥怷庣, 帠帠庰彖庰彃 帤廔 廒庛庢彖帢巹彖, 廒怷彖 廔廔 峉帢庥怷巹彖 怷弇庰弮怷弮庰彖怷庣. 庣庰庤弮庰彖怷庣 帤廔 彃 怷弇峟弮彃 庥帢廔 帤庣廔 廔棒 廔庰怷廔棒 彃僇 峉帢庥怷巹彖 庥庣彖帤彖庰怷彖庰 廒弇彃僇諄敖 庥帢廔 庥峎怷, 廒徆峟庰弮帢彖 峟帣庰庣 庰廒區 廔區 廒庛峸彖帢, 廒徆庣怷彃缶誕庰 廔裕 帤彃弮怷彖 帣怷庢庛彃帢庣 廔棒 帢巹庢彖 庥帢廔 廔棒 弇庣彖 廒帢彃僇 廒庥 彃僇 庥庣彖帤彖彖 彃甩帢庛帢庣繚 廒缶 帤廔 彃僇 廒庰帢弇弮峟彖彖 廒庣庰帣庰廔棲 怷帠巹帢 廔 彃用晅, 帤庰庣彖庢庣 弇帠怷 怷弇廔 怷峟彖 峎彖彖 彃僇 庥帢庛宎 廒帢彖. 怷廔怷 庥帢廔 峟彖帢 彃用煙怷庣庥廔區 彃剿怷 廒徆庰彃羊庰 庥帢廔 庥帢廔 廔棒 怷庣庰巹帢彖 怷怷彃羊怷 怷廔磁 廒弇弇怷 廔庰峟帣帢弇庰彖, 廔甩庰 弮庣庛廔裕 弇帢弮帣峎彖庰庣彖 帢廔 彃僇 弮帢庛庢彃僇 弮彖彄剿 廒庥帢彖. 怷廔怷 怷廔彖 庥帢帢彖峸帢 庰廒區 廔區 廒庛峸彖帢 庥帢廔 帢帢庛庰廔剿 庰廒區 廔裕 帤彃弮怷彖 帤庣庰弇峟庛庢 怷彃 廒庛庢彖帢巹怷庣 庰廔 彃 弮弮帢巹帢 庥帢廔 彃 徆庰彖巹庤怷彖庣 彃 弇峟徆庰 廒徆峟弇庢徆庰 怷廔磁 廒庛庢彖帢巹怷 廔彖帢 庰廔庰彃 庥帢廔 庣弇怷弇帠怷. 彃剿怷 帠廔區 廒峸帢怷 怷彃 彃 弇峟徆庰 庢弮帢庣弮怷彃 庰庣怷峟怷庣 庥帢廔 彃 庣弇怷庰彖巹彄 帤庣帢峟怷庣彖, 廒彖庣庛峟怷庣 庥帢廔 廒區怷庥弇怷庣 庥帢廔 帢巹怷庣 庥帢廔 廔弮怷庣怷庰弇庰怷庣 庥帢巹 庣庣彖 廒峟怷庣 怷庣怷怷庣, 廒 庰 弮廔統 帤庣廔 廔 徆峟彖怷彖 彃 庥帢帢庥庰彃 廒怷帤怷彃 廒徆庣怷彃羊怷.
16 廔弮怷庰弇庰怷庣 ll.
25. Di怷nys. de Lysia I p. 11.3 U. R. (458 R.): 廒甩帢怷 帤廔 庥帢廔 彃僇 廒庛峸彖庢庣 彃用煙彖 廒 怷庣庢庣庥峸 庰 庥帢廔 怷庣庥廔 峎庣, 廔＋ 弮廔統 峇廒匿樁敖圖 庢庣, 怷帠巹怷 廒徆帢彖怷, 廒﹡諄翁監 廒庛峸彖帢庤庰 庰帣庰彖 庥帢庰弇峸徆帢怷 怷廔磁 廒庥怷怷彖帢 彃 帤庢弮庢帠怷巹彄.
Notabis etiam commentaria, cum a Gorgia rhetoricen Athenas translatam esse contendant, nihil aliud testimonii causa proferre quam orationis in contione Atheniensium habitae verborum pulchritudinem. Minus recte autem R. (P. S. p. 27) Platonis Hippiae maioris 282B eiusdem rei gratia laudat, cum Plato nihil dicat, nisi Gorgiam sicut Prodicum et in contione optime dicere visum esse et sophisticas declamationes instituisse.
26. Plato Hipp. mai. 281D: 廒宎 怷廔彖 廔裒 庣, 廔甩庰 帢廒 廒弇弇帢庣 峟彖帢庣 廒庣帤庰帤庥帢庣 庥帢巹 庰廒區庣 帢廔 怷廔磁 彖彃缶 帤庢弮庣怷帠怷廔磁 怷廒 帢弇帢庣怷廔 帢彃缶銜諺, 怷廔 庥帢廔 廔棒 廔弮庰峟帢彖 廔棒 彃僇 怷庣彃僇 峟彖庢彖 廒庣帤庰帤庥峟彖帢庣 彃僇樁舒 庥帢廔 庰廒僇諄敖 彃僇 廒帢巹彖 怷廔磁 庰廔 廔棒 怷巹帢彖 帢弇怷 廔裒 廔弮彄剿 峎彖 弮廔統 怷廔彖 廔庛彃剿 弇峟帠庰庣. - 庰廒 廒帢 彖彃缶 廒﹡澄彖, 廒圖巹帢, 廔 B巹帢 廒彖帢帣庣彃棒, 帠峟弇宎 廒彖 廔弇怷庣 廔裒 廔弮彄剿, (282) 廔甩庰 庥帢廔 廔裕 帢巹帤帢弇彖 帢庣彖 怷廒 廒彖帤庣帢彖怷怷庣怷巹, 彖彃缶 庰廒 帠庰彖弮庰彖怷 怷庣帢彃羊宎 廒帠峎庤怷庣怷, 怷廒煎 廒缶, 廒宎 廔形 怷廔彖怷弮宎 廒庰彖, 庥帢帢帠峟弇帢怷彖 廒彖 庰廒僇諄敖. - 廒庣 弮廔統 帢彃羊帢, 廔 峉庥帢庰, 怷廔, 廔＋ 廔 弇峟帠庰庣. 庰廒棲庛帢 弮峟彖怷庣 廒帠帠庰 怷廔磁 帢弇帢庣怷 庰 庥帢廔 怷峟怷 廒﹡澄蕊彖 怷峟怷 庰 庥帢廔 弮彄僇銜銜諺 廒帠庥弮庣峎庤庰庣彖 廒 怷廔磁 彖彃缶, 庰廔弇帢帣怷弮庰彖怷 弮廔統 庛彖怷彖 彃僇 庤彖彖, 怷帣怷弮庰彖怷 帤廔 弮彃彖庣彖 彃僇 庰庰弇庰庢庥彖. - (282B) 庥帢弇彃剿 帠庰 , 廔 廒圖巹帢, 廔彖怷弮峎庤彖 庰 庥帢廔 帤庣帢彖怷怷弮庰彖怷, 廔＋ 廒弮怷廔 帤怷庥庰彃. 弮弮帢彃帢庣 帤峟 怷庣 廒, 廔庣 廒弇庢庛彃 弇峟帠庰庣 庥帢廔 彃 廔彖庣 廔弮彃僇 廒庣帤峟帤庥庰彖 廒 峟彖庢 廔裒 廔 庥帢廔 廔 帤庢弮庣帢 峎庰庣彖 帤彖帢庛帢庣 弮庰廔 彃僇 廒匿棒耆彖. 怷帠巹帢 庰 帠廔區 怷廔怷 廔 庰怷彖彃彖怷 怷庣廔棲 帤庰彃羊怷 廒巹庥庰怷 帤庢弮怷巹彄 怷廒棒睡諺裕舒 庰帣庰彖, 廔＋ 廒敖睡敖賦蝸帢怷 廔卅 庰怷彖巹彖彖 廔 庥怷庣彖廔 峎庰庣彖, 庥帢廔 廒彖 庰 彃 帤峸弮彃 廒帤怷徆庰彖 廒庣帢 庰廒區庰彃彖 庥帢廔 廒匿棒脊噫 廒庣帤庰巹徆庰庣 怷庣怷弮庰彖怷 庥帢廔 彖廔樁 (282C) 怷彃 彖峟怷庣 峸弮帢帢 怷弇弇廔 庰廒區帠峎帢怷 庥帢廔 廒弇帢帣庰彖 廒庥 彃帤庰 彃 弇庰. 庰廒 帤廔 帣怷弇庰庣, 廔 廒﹡樁倔庰怷 廒帢彃怷 帤庣庥怷 怷廔怷 怷弇弇峎庥庣 弮廔統 庥帢廔 廒弇弇怷庰 帤庢弮怷巹彄 廒巹庥庰怷, 廒廔區 廔 庰弇庰帢彃帢 廒彖帢帠怷 廒庣庥弮庰彖怷 帤庢弮怷巹彄 廒庥 峟 弇峟帠彖 宎 廒彖 彃 帣怷弇彃 峎彖 庰廔帤怷庥巹弮庢庰 庥帢廔 廒匿棒脊噫 廒庣帤庰巹徆庰庣 怷庣怷弮庰彖怷 庥帢廔 怷彃 彖峟怷庣 彖彃僇 峸弮帢帢 廒弇帢帣庰 庛帢弮帢廔 廔帢. 彃僇 帤廔 帢弇帢庣彃僇 廒庥庰巹彖彖 怷廔帤庰彃 怷庰 廒徆巹庰彖 廒帠庣怷彖 弮庣庛廔裕 峎徆帢庛帢庣 怷廔帤宎 廒庣帤庰巹徆庰庣 怷庣峸帢庛帢庣 廒彖 帢彖怷帤帢怷彃 廒彖庛怷庣 彃 廒帢怷彃 怷巹帢. (282D) 怷廔 廒羊帢彖 庰廔峸庛庰庣 庥帢廔 廒弇庰弇峸庛庰庣 帢廔怷廔磁 廒帠庣怷彖 廔＋ 怷弇弇怷彃 廒徆庣怷彖 庰廒棒. 怷彖 帤宎 廒庥峎庰怷 弇峟怷彖 廒帠庣怷彖 廒廔 怷巹帢 庰廒棲帠帢帢庣 廒 廒弇弇怷 帤庢弮庣怷帠廔裒 廒宎 廒彷 庣彖怷 峟彖庢. 庥帢廔 廒庣 庰怷 怷彖 帢帠帢.
29 廒帠庣怷彖 F: 廒帠巹怷 TW
27. Philod. rhet. I p. 188.21: 峎帢 帠廔區 廒[廔跑 怷彖 庥帢彃庛帢巹 [庣] 廒庰彃 廔區 帤庣帢庣帣峎, 廒區[庥]峟彖帢庣 帤廔 怷廔帤庰廔剿 弮廔 庰[弇峟 廒]彖帢庣彖彃僇.
廒廔 怷彖 i. e. Periclis et Thucydidis aetate, quos antea nominaverat.
28. Vita Antiphontis orationibus praemissa: 廒彖庣彃僇 廒晨螂 弮廔統 廒缶 峉巹弇怷, 弇彃 帤廔 廒匿敖誕巹帤怷, 彃疥敖樁諄諫庣怷 廔裕 帤彃弮怷彖, 庥帢廔 帤廔 廔 庰庣庥廔 帠庰彖弮庰彖怷 彖峸庥弮帢庰 怷帠巹彄 彃 怷庣彃, 庥帢廔 帤庣帤帢庥峎弇彃 廔 彃剿帢 庢峎弮庰彖怷 彃 帢廔 帤庣帤峎庥怷彖庣 帠峎弮弮帢帢, 彃 廒﹡銜團睡翁救 怷帣帢庣彖怷庢 廔 庰廔 怷廔磁 弇帠怷 廒徆庰彖庢庰 庣庥彃 帤庰庣彖庢庣, 廔棒 廒庥 彃 廒庥峸庰 弮庰弇峟庢彖 怷弇帢帣彖, 弮庢帤庰彖廔裒 弮廔統 廒庥怷帢峎弮庰彖怷, 廔庣 弮庢帤宎 廒缶 庣 庰 弮峸庰 弇帠彖 弮峸庰 庰彖彃僇 彃用煙怷庣庥彃僇 帠帠帢庰, 弮峸庰 怷庣廔棲 怷庰庢庥廔樞 帤庣帢庣帣彃. 怷彃 廔 帢廔怷彃 帤廔 廒彖廔樁 帣庣帣弇巹怷庣 庥帢廔 怷彃 彃僇 怷庣庢彃僇 弮峎弇庣帢, 庰廒區 怷怷彃羊怷彖 怷彃弇庛庰 帤庰庣彖庢怷, 廔甩庰 峟 廒庰庥帢弇庰彃怷 帤庣廔 廔棒 廒彖 彃 弇峟帠庰庣彖 廒帤怷彖峸彖.
Traditio est minime neglegenda, qua usus est is, qui vitam Antiphontis in vitis 峓 oratorum Plutarcheis composuit, item Sudae lexicon. [廔 帢庥怷 庥]帢[廔跑 廒彖庣彃僇稼怷] 庥帢廔 [帢彖廔窟 廒[]弇彃剿 庰彖怷帠峎[怷] supplendum videtur apud Philodemum rhet. I p. 187.16 sq. eademque res agi apud eundem II p. 111, fr. XXI. Adde Schol. in Prol. in Hermogenem W VII 6 = P. S. p. 189.9: 廒弇弇怷庣 帤廔 弇峟帠怷庣彖 廒彖庣彃僇誕帢 怷彃羊怷彖 廔裕 彃用晅怷帢 scil. 帤庣庥帢彖庣庥廔裕 弇帠怷彖 庰廒區庢庥峟彖帢庣 彃剿怷彖. Cf. Philodemus l. supra l. et Pseudoplutarchi vit. X 怷r. 832 C.
29. Isocr. Antid. 15.295: 峎彖彖 彃僇 帤彖帢弮峟彖彖 弇峟帠庰庣彖 廒 帢庣帤庰庰庣彖 廒 弇庣 廒﹡澄蕊彖 帤怷庥庰彃 帠庰帠庰彖彃庛帢庣 帤庣帤峎庥帢弇怷, 庰廒匿磁繚 庥帢廔 帠廔區 廒庛弇帢 弮峟帠庣帢 庣庛庰彃帢彖 帢廔廔棒 廔彃剿庣 怷彃 廔棒 帤彖帢弮庣彖 帢庢彖 廒怷庣 庥帢廔 帠弮彖峎庣帢 弇庰彃帢 庥帢廔 帢彖怷帤帢廔誕帢帢 帢峟怷帢彖 怷彃 廒帠彖巹庤庰庛帢庣 怷彃庢弮峟彖怷庣 庥帢廔 庰廔 廔 怷庣帢彃羊帢 帠弮彖峎庤庰庛帢庣 帣怷弇怷弮峟彖怷庣, 廒庣 帤廔 廔棒 廒弮庰庣巹帢彖, 廒甩庰 弮峎弇庣帢 怷庣庰彃 帤彖帢庛帢庣 弇峟帠庰庣彖, 廒彖庛峟彖帤庰 峎彖帢 弇帢弮帣峎彖怷彖帢. 廔裒 帤廔 怷怷庣 庥帢廔 廔棒 彃 彖彃 庥怷庣彖庢帢 庥帢廔 弮庰庣庢帢 庥帢廔 廔棒 廒弇弇庢彖 庰廔帢庰弇巹帢彖 庥帢廔 庣弇怷弇怷帠巹帢彖 怷廔 弮庣庥廔裕 廒﹡割蹄縝彖帢庣 弮帣帢弇峟庛帢庣 弮峟怷 廔裒 廔棒 彃僇 弇帠彖 帢庣帤庰巹帢彖. 廔甩宎 怷廔庥 廒帤巹庥 廔怷弇帢弮帣峎彖怷庣彖 廒帢彖帢 怷廔磁 弇峟帠庰庣彖 廔彖帢 帤庰庣彖怷廔磁 彃 弇庰 庰廒僇諄敖 弮帢庛庢峎.
5 廔 怷庣帢彃羊帢: 帢彃羊帢 廔區 怷庣帢帢 cett. ll. 9 弮帣峎弇弇庰庛帢庣
Cf. Cic. Brut. 13 (49). De sophistis Athenas incolentibus lepide Aristoph. Av. 1694 sq.
30. Isocr. Antid. 15.41: 廒弇弇廔 弮廔棒 庥廒庥庰彃彖怷 彄剿庣 帢彖庰彖 廒庣彖, 廔庣 帢弮弇庢庛庰彃 庰廒區庣彖 怷廒 帢帢庥庰峎庤怷彖庰 怷廔磁 弇帠怷 怷彃 廒彖 怷彃 帤庣庥帢庢巹怷庣 廒帠彖庣庤怷弮峟彖怷庣. 怷彖 弮廔統 怷巹彖彖 怷怷彖 廔彖彖 怷廔帤庰廔剿 怷庰 帢彖峸庰帢庣 弮帢庛庢彃僇 廒徆庣弮峟彖怷.
1 庥廒庥庰彃彖 帠庰 3 怷廔磁 廒彖 . 帤. 廒帠彖庣庤怷弮峟彖怷
31. Isocr. 庥帢廔 彃僇 怷庣彃僇 13.9 sq.: 怷廔 弮彖怷彖 帤廔 怷怷庣 廒弇弇廔 庥帢廔 怷彃 怷廔磁 怷弇庣庣庥怷廔磁 弇帠怷 廔庣彖怷弮峟彖怷庣 廒徆庣怷彖 廒庣庣弮彃帢庣繚 庥帢廔 帠廔區 廒庥庰彃彖怷庣 彃 弮廔統 廒弇庢庛庰巹帢 怷廔帤廔統 怷彖巹庤怷庣彖, 廒﹡割蹄縝彖帢庣 帤廔 怷彃羊宎 庰廒僇諄敖 廔棒 峟彖庢彖, 廒卅 廔＋ 弇庰巹怷 彃 弮庣庥庢庣 彃僇 弮庣庛彃僇 庥帢廔 彃 弮庰帠峟庛庰庣 彃僇 廒帢帠帠庰弇弮峎彖 怷帢帠峎帠彖帢庣 庥帢廔 弇帢帣庰彃彖 庣 帢宎 帢廔彃僇 帤彖庢庛彃剿庣彖繚 怷廔 帤宎 廒彖帢庣庛峸 帢廔怷巹 庰 帤庣峎庥庰庣彖帢庣 庥帢廔 怷廔磁 廒弇弇怷 廒庰庣彖 廔庰庣弇峸帢庣彖, 廔甩庰 庰彃怷彖 帠峎o彖庰 怷廔磁 弇帠怷 廒 彃僇 廒匿棒圖彃僇 庣彖庰 帢廔怷庰帤庣峎庤怷庣彖, 廔弮 廔庣彖怷彃缶誕帢庣 怷庣怷怷 彃用晅怷帢 怷廔磁 彖彖帢 怷庣峸庰庣彖 廔甩庰 弮庢帤廔統 彃僇 廒彖彖彖 廒彖 怷彃 峎帠弮帢庣彖 帢帢弇庣庰彃彖. (10) 庥帢廔 帢庢 彃 帤彖峎弮庰 怷廔帤廔統 怷廔庰 帢彃 廒弮庰庣巹帢庣 怷廔庰 彃 庰庣 彃 怷彃 弮帢庛庢怷彃 弮庰帢帤庣帤帢庣彖, 廒弇弇峎 帢庣彖 廔弮怷巹 廔棒 彃僇 弇帠彖 廒庣峸弮庢彖 廔甩庰 廔棒 彃僇 帠帢弮弮峎彖 帢帢帤庰庣彖, 廔＋ 弮廔統 廒庰庣 怷彖 廒庥峎庰怷彖 怷廔庥 廒徆庰峎帢彖庰, 怷廒區弮庰彖怷庣 帤廔 帤庣廔 廔區 廔庰帣怷弇廔區 彃僇 廒帢帠帠庰弇弮峎彖 帢廔怷巹 庰 庛帢弮帢庛峸庰庛帢庣 庥帢廔 廔棒 帢巹帤庰庣彖 廔棒 彃僇 弇帠彖 弇庰巹怷彖怷 廒徆巹帢彖 帤徆庰庣彖 庰廒僇諄敖, 庥帢庥彃剿 庰廒匿棲庰, 廔庣 弮庰帠峎弇帢 怷庣怷彃羊庣 廔區 峟彖帢 怷廔 怷廒 怷弇弮彃僇誕庰 廒弇帢庤怷彖庰庰庛帢庣 庰廔 帢廔彃僇, 廒弇弇宎 怷廒舜庣彖庰 廒彖, 廔怷彖 廒彖庰庣彖 廒彖 廒庥峎庢, 怷彃羊宎 廒徆庰庰彃彖 帤彖庢庛彃剿庣彖.
4/5 怷彃 弮庣庛怷彃 v. l. 13 帠帢弮弮峎彖 : 帢帠弮峎彖 prima manu, quod probaverat Gercke, probat Suess (Susemihl, Rh. M. 55.577 sq.).
Cf. ibid. 12 sq., et quae infra ad Isocratis 13.12 in fragmentorum eius sylloge adnotavimus. Tum Hippocrates 庰廔 彖 彃僇 庥帢宎 廒彖庛怷彖 41-45 (Pohlenz, G繹tt. Gel. Nachr. N. F. II 4 (1937) 98 sq.). Ad 廔庰庣彖 9 sq. vid. Plato Phaedr. 235 B. Aischines 2.38. Theophrastus Char. 17.8 (Usener, Kl. Schriften I 26).
32. Xen. Mem. 1.2.31: 廒徆 廔形 帤廔 庥帢廔 廒弮巹庰庣 廔裕 峉庥峎庢 廔 庣巹帢, 廔甩庰 庥帢廔 廔庰 彃僇 庣峎庥怷彖帢 廔卅 彖怷弮怷庛峟庢 弮庰廔 峓帢庣庥弇峟怷 廒帠峟彖庰怷 廒庰弮彖庢弮彖庰庰彖 帢廔彃 庥帢廔 廒彖 怷彃 彖弮怷庣 廒帠帢庰 弇帠彖 峟彖庢彖 弮廔 帤庣帤峎庥庰庣彖.
Cf. Sextus Emp. adv. math. II 20 sq. Philod. II p. 216.I 359 c怷l. LXX. Idem Plato sentit atque Critias consanguineus Leg. 峓I 938, mortis oratoribus minans supplicium.
33. Diog. Laert. 4.1.4 de Speusipp怷: 庥帢帢弇峟弇怷庣庰 帤廔 峎弮弇庰庣帢 廔怷弮彖峸弮帢帢 . . . 廒彖 怷廒煙 庥帢廔 . . 庰彖彃僇 廒弇庰帠怷 帢 .
(1f. Wendland 35.2. De artium omnium obtrectatoribus loquitur iam Hippocrates (7) 庰廔 彖庢 c. 1, de Protagora Plato Soph. 232D. Umbram rei habes apud eundem Rei publ. 495C sq., ipsius rhetoricae censura legitur Leg. 937E. Philod. rhet. I p. 79.23 Sudh. = Philod. Suppl. p. 40.2: 廒弇庰巹[彖怷] 帠廔區 廒彖 怷彃 [廒唸摯庰]廔 廒帠帠彃[ 庥]帢庢帠怷怷彃缶誕怷 彃僇 彃用煙怷庣庥彃僇 怷庣彃僇, 廔庣 怷弇弇廔 庤庢怷彃羊庣彖 廒峸, 彖 廒庣 庥帢廔 廔 庰廔 廔棒 弇峟徆庣彖 帢廔彃僇 帢帠弮峎庰弮帢 庥帢廔 廔 庰廔 廔棒 [弮彖]峸弮庢彖, 庥帢廔 廒彖 怷廒煙 廒庣庤庢怷彃羊庣弇峟帠庰庣彖, 廔弮庢[]怷[彖 廔]怷庛庰帣庢庥峟彖[帢庣 怷彃 廒]庰庣彖 廔形 廒廔 [彄跑帢 廒用棒煙怷帣峟帣庢庥庰宎, 庥帢廔 庰廔 庣彖彃僇 廒弇弇彖 [帢]峎 庰 怷[]庣 庥帢廔 [帢宎 X]廔庣巹帤彃... . Sequentia admodum incerta, F uit inter rhetoricae obtrectatores etiam 廔 庢彖帢彃怷 庛庰帤怷 cognomine 廒庛庰怷 (Philod. l. 1. II p. 116 fr. IX). Agnon quis fuerit, qui 庥帢庢帠怷巹帢彖 彃用煙怷庣庥彃 scripsit (Quintil. inst. 2.17,15), ignoratur (Sauppe Dr. Att. II 344).
34. Aristot. Eth. Nicom. 1164 a 27: 怷廒 帤廔 怷弇帢弮帣峎彖怷彖庰 廔 廒帠庣怷彖, 庰廒剿帢 弮庢帤廔統 怷庣怷彃缶誕庰 廔形 廒帢帢彖 帤庣廔 廔區 廔庰帣怷弇廔區 彃僇 廒帢帠帠庰弇庣彃僇, 庰廒匿磁 廒彖 廒帠庥弇峸弮帢庣 帠巹彖怷彖帢庣繚 怷廔 帠廔區 廒庣庰弇怷彃羊庣彖 廒 廔﹡樁諺銨帠庢帢彖. 怷彃羊怷 帤宎 廒棲 怷庣庰彃彖 怷廒 怷庣帢廔 廒彖帢帠庥峎庤怷彖帢庣 帤庣廔 廔 弮庢帤峟彖帢 廒彖 帤怷彃缶諄敖 廒帠庣怷彖 廔形 廒巹帢彖帢庣. 怷廔怷庣 弮廔統 怷廔彖, 廔形 廒弇帢帣怷彖 廔裕 弮庣庛彖, 弮廔 怷庣怷彃缶誕庰 庰廒匿磁 廒彖 廒帠庥弇峸弮帢巹彖 庰廒區庣彖.
35. Isocr Antid. 15.197: 廔區 帣弇帢庢弮巹帢 庥帢廔 庥帢庢帠怷巹帢, 帢廒煙 彃僇誕帢庣 庥帢庛宎 廒﹡澄蕊彖, 廒徆庰弇峟帠徆怷弮庰彖 庰帤庰彃 怷廔帢. 庰廒區廔 帤廔 帤庣帢巹 弇峟帠怷庣 帠廔區 怷廒 弮峟彖, 廔＋ 廒庣彖 廒 庰廔 怷廔磁 怷庣廔區 帤庣帢庣帣廔 弇帢巹帢 庥帢廔 庰彖帢庥庣弮繚 怷廔帤庰弮巹帢 帠廔區 庰廔庢帢庣 帢庣帤庰巹帢 怷庣帢庢, 帤庣宎 廒彷 帠峟彖怷庣 庣 廒彖 廒 庰廔 怷廔磁 弇帠怷 帤庰庣彖庰怷 廒 庰 庰廔 廔區 峎徆庰庣 怷彖庣弮庰怷, 廒弇弇宎 怷i 怷峟怷彖庰 廒彖 怷怷庣 彃 庰庣 彃僇 廒弇弇彖 帤庣帢峟怷庣彖. 怷廒 帤廔 帤庰庣彖怷峟怷 弮廔統 廔弮怷弇怷帠怷彃羊庣彖 庰廒僇諄敖 怷廔磁 庰廔 廔棒 弮庰弇峟庢彖 帢庢彖 廔彖帢, 怷廔 弮廔棒 廒弇弇廔 帤庣帢庛庰巹 庰庛帢庣 庥帢廔 帠巹帠彖庰庛帢庣 庰巹怷繚 廒庰庣帤廔匿 帠廔區 弇峎帣庣 帤彖帢弮庣彖, 怷彃 廒弇弇怷巹怷庣 廒庣帣怷弇庰庰庣彖. 15
1 廔區 庥帢. 2 帢廒煙 彖彃缶 彃僇誕帢庣 1 5 廒彖 om. ante 帠峟彖怷庣怷 Sophistarum cavillationem habes e.g. in Cynegetici, qui 峓enophonti tribuitur, cap. 峓III. Ipsa autem quae tractatur, quaestio trita est in posteriorum controversiis. Cf. Maximi Planudis 庰廒區 帤庰彃僇 帢宎 scholia W V 440, 25: 廔 帤峟 帠庰 X巹庥怷怷 廒彖 彃 庰廔 彃用煙怷庣庥彃 (fr, 55 Us.) 帢廔庛帢帤峟庰怷彖, 怷廒匿樁敖. 弇峟帠彖 庢廔僇 帢廔廔裒 弮彖怷 庰廔庢庥峟彖帢庣 峟彖庢彖 怷弇庣庣庥彃僇 弇帠彖, 怷廔磁 帤廔 廒弇弇怷 廒怷庥怷帢庥巹庤彖 彃用晅怷帢 廒帢彃 弮弮庰彖帢 弇峟帠庰庣 庣 帠峎 廒庣彖 廒 庥帢怷 庛怷彃羊帢 弇帠怷, 峟彖庢 帤廔 怷廔帤庰弮巹帢, quas esse nugas equidem non putaverim.
36. Philod. rhet. I p. 210.9: 廒帠 帤宎 (sc. 弇峟帠) 廒庥[庰彃]彖怷 [怷廔磁] 怷庣廔區 弮庢帤廔 怷弇弇怷[廔裕稽 廒徆庰巹庥庰庣彖 彃僇 廒彖帤庰[怷]弮峟彖彖 廒彖 怷彃 怷弇庰庣[庣庥]怷彃, 廔怷彖 廒廔 帢彃 庰彖怷弇怷帠巹帢庣. 峎弇庣 帤宎 廒庰怷 弮廔統 峸庰庣 庥帢廔 怷 弮庰帠峎弇怷 怷庣廔區 廒彖 怷彃 怷[]庣庣庥怷彃 廒帤彖帢庰[彃]彖, 廔＋ 庥[帢廔跑 廔區 廒庥帤庰帤怷弮峟彖帢 廔宎 帢[廔)彃僇 廒彖 峟彖帢 庥帢廔 廔 帢帢弇峸庣帢 帤庣帢帢庰彃彖.
37. Aristot. Rhet. 1.1 1354b16: 帢彖庰廔裕 廔庣 廔 廒徆 怷彃 峎帠弮帢怷 庰彖怷弇怷帠怷彃羊庣彖 廔怷庣 廒弇弇帢 帤庣怷巹庤怷庣彖, 怷廒煎諺 巹 帤庰彃 廔 怷 怷巹弮庣怷彖 廒 廔棒 帤庣峸帠庢庣彖 廒庰庣彖, 庥帢廔 彃僇 廒弇弇彖 廒庥帢怷彖 弮怷巹彖繚 怷廔帤峟彖 帠廔區 廒彖 帢廔怷彃 廒弇弇o 帢帠弮帢庰怷彖帢庣 弇廔棒 廔 廔裕 庥庣廔棒 怷庣彖 庣彖帢 怷庣峸庣彖, 庰廔 帤廔 彃僇 廒彖峟彖彖 巹庰彖 怷廔帤廔統 帤庰庣庥彖怷庣彖, 怷彃羊怷 帤宎 廒廔僇 廔庛庰彖 廒彖 庣 帠峟彖怷庣怷 廒彖庛弮庢弮帢庣庥. 帤庣廔 帠廔區 怷彃羊怷, 彃 帢廔彃 怷廔庢 弮庰庛帤怷 庰廔 廔 帤庢弮庢帠怷庣庥廔 庥帢廔 帤庣庥帢彖庣庥廔 庥帢廔 庥帢弇弇巹怷彖怷 庥帢廔 怷弇庣庣庥峟帢 彃 帤庢弮庢帠怷庣庥彃 帢帠弮帢庰巹帢 怷廔庢 廒 彃 庰廔 廔 彖帢弇弇峎帠弮帢帢, 庰廔 弮峟彖 廒庥庰巹彖庢 怷廔帤廔統 弇峟帠怷庣彖 庰廔 帤廔 怷彃 帤庣庥峎庤庰庛帢庣 峎彖庰 庰庣彃僇誕帢庣 庰彖怷弇怷帠庰彃彖, 廔庣 廒彷彖 廒庣 廔 廒帠怷 廔 廒徆 怷彃 峎帠弮帢怷 弇峟帠庰庣彖 廒彖 怷彃 帤庢弮庢帠怷庣庥怷彃 庥帢廔 廒彷彖 廒庣 庥帢庥怷彃羊帠怷彖 廒 帤庢弮庢帠怷巹帢 帤庣庥怷弇怷帠巹帢, 廔庣 庥怷庣彖庰怷彖.
12 廔庣: 廒弇弇廔 v. 1.
Dictum quidem esse, sed non scriptum 庰廔 帤庢弮庢帠怷巹帢 Plato testatur (cf. A V 43). Aristot. rhet. 1356a19: 廔庣 弮廔統 怷廔彖 廔 廒徆 怷彃 峎帠弮帢怷 怷廒 廒弇弇怷庣 庰彖怷弇怷帠怷彃羊庣 庥帢廔 帤庣宎 廔 庣 弮彄僇銜銜諺 廒怷彖庰彖庰庥帢庣 廔裒 廔 帤庣庥怷弇怷帠庰彃彖, 帢彖庰彖.
38. Plut. Them. 2.4: 弮彄僇銜銜諺 怷廔彖 廒彖 庣 怷峟怷庣 怷彃 M彖庢庣巹弇怷 廔裕 庰弮庣怷庥弇峟帢 怷彃 峖庰帢巹怷 庤庢弇廔棒 帠庰彖峟庛帢庣 弇峟帠怷庣彖, 怷廔庰 彃用晅怷怷 廔彖怷 怷廔庰 彃僇 庣庥彃僇 庥弇庢庛峟彖彖 庣弇怷 彖, 廒弇弇廔 廔棒 庥帢弇怷弮峟彖庢彖 怷巹帢彖, 怷廔帢彖 帤廔 帤庰庣彖庢帢 怷弇庣庣庥廔棒 庥帢廔 帤帢峸庣怷彖 彖庰庣彖, 廒庣峸帤庰弮帢 庰怷庣庢弮峟彖怷 庥帢廔 帤庣帢彃割僇諺誕怷 廔甩庰 帢庰庣彖 廒庥 帤庣帢帤怷彃 廒廔 峉弇彖怷. 廒用 怷廒 弮庰廔 帢彃羊帢 帤庣庥帢彖庣 庥帢彃 弮庰巹徆帢彖庰 峟彖帢庣 庥帢廔 弮庰帢帠帢帠彖庰 廒廔 彃僇 峎徆庰彖 廔棒 廒庥庢庣彖 廒廔 怷 弇帠怷 怷庣帢廔 怷庢帠怷庰庛庢帢彖.
39. Isocr. C. soph. 13.19: 弇怷庣怷廔 帤宎 廒﹡澄彖 庰廒區庣彖 怷廒 廔 廒﹡澄蕊彖 帠庰彖弮庰彖怷庣 庥帢廔 廔區 庥帢弇怷弮峟彖帢 峟彖帢 帠峎帢庣 怷弇弮峸 帢彖庰, 怷廔 o廔庥 廒庰峟怷彖 廒彖庰庣庣弮峸怷繚 怷廒舜庣彖庰 廔峟怷彖怷 帤庣庥峎 庤庰庛帢庣 帤庣帤峎庥庰庣彖, 廒庥弇庰徆峎弮庰彖怷庣 廔 帤庰峟帢怷彖 彃僇 廔彖怷弮峎彖, 廔 彃僇 庛怷彖怷彖彖 廒帠怷彖 廒缶 弇峟帠庰庣彖 廒弇弇宎 怷廔 彃僇 怷庰廔樞彖 彃 怷庣帢庢 帢庣帤庰庰帢, 庥帢廔 帢彃羊帢 怷彃 峎帠弮帢怷, 庥帢庛宎 廔怷彖 廒廔 帤庣帤帢庥彖, 怷廔帤廔統 弮彄僇銜銜諺 廔裒 怷廔磁 帤庣庥帢彖庣庥怷廔磁 弇帠怷 廒 廔裒 怷廔磁 廒弇弇怷 廒帢彖帢 庰弇庰彃彖 帤彖帢弮峟彖怷.
40. Plato Leg. 937D-E: 庥帢廔 帤廔 庥帢廔 帤巹庥庢 廒彖 廒彖庛怷庣 彃剿 怷廔 庥帢弇彖, 廔 峎彖帢 廒﹡樁倔庥庰 廔 廒彖庛庣彖帢 庥帢弇怷彃 帤廔 廔彖怷 怷怷 彃剿 怷廔 庥帢廔 廔 徆彖帤庣庥庰彃彖 廒﹡澄彖 帠巹帠彖怷庣宎 廒彖 庥帢弇彖 帢彃羊帢 怷廔彖 怷庣帢彃羊帢 廔彖帢 帤庣帢帣峎弇弇庰庣 庣 庥峎庥庢, 庥帢弇廔裕 廔彖怷弮帢 怷庢帢弮峟彖庢 峟彖庢彖, 廒 彃剿怷彖 弮廔統 帤峸 庢庣彖 庰廒僇諄敖 庣彖帢 帤庣庥彃僇 弮庢帢彖峸彖, 庰廒僇諄敖 5 帤宎 帢廔廔棒 彃 庰 帤庣庥峎帢庛帢庣 庥帢廔 徆彖帤庣庥庰彃彖 廒弇弇彃 彖庣庥彄僇 帤彖帢弮峟彖庢彖, 廒彖 宎 怷廔彖 帤巹庥帢庣帢 廒彖 庰 弮廔 廔 庰廔 廔棒 帤巹庥庢彖 廒庥峎庢彖 彄 庰帢帠 弮峟彖帢繚 帤庰廔匿 帤宎 帢廔彃 庰廒僇諄敖 彃 峟彖庢 庥帢廔 彃僇 弇帠彖 彃僇 廒庥 彃 峟彖庢, 廒彖 廒彖庣帤彃帢巹 庣 峸弮帢帢.
5 庰廒僇諄敖 帤宎 帢彃羊庢 怷彃 庰
41. Arist. Rhet. 1.1 1354a11: 彖彃缶 弮廔統 怷廔彖 怷廒 廔區 峟彖帢 彃僇 弇帠彖 彖庣庛峟彖庰 廔弇巹帠怷彖 庰怷庣峸庥帢庣彖 帢廔彃 (峟彖庢) 弮庣怷彖. 帢廒 帠廔區 巹庰庣 廒彖庰彖彖 廒庣 弮彖怷彖, 廔 帤宎 廒弇弇帢 怷庛彃庥帢庣. 怷廒 帤廔 庰廔 弮廔統 廒彖庛弮庢弮峎彖 怷廔帤廔統 弇峟帠怷庣彖, 廔庰 廒廔 彃僇樁 彃 巹 庰, 庰廔 帤廔 彃進彖 廒徆 怷彃 峎帠弮帢怷 廔 弇庰彃帢 帢帠弮帢庰怷彖帢庣. 5 帤庣帢帣怷弇廔 帠廔區 庥帢廔 廒弇庰怷 庥帢廔 廔帠廔 庥帢廔 廔 怷庣帢彃羊帢 峎庛庢 彃 彃 怷廔 庰廔 怷彃 峎帠弮帢 廒庣彖, 廒弇弇廔 廔裒 廔裕 帤庣庥帢峸彖.
2 庰怷巹庥帢庣彖 Bekker ex Marciano, Ac in mg. 帢彃] 帢廔怷彃 ll. quidam 3 怷庛峸庥庢 nonnulli l1
Cf. 1356a15 怷廔 帠廔區 廔弮怷巹 廒怷帤巹帤怷弮庰彖 廔區 庥巹庰庣 弇怷弮庰彖怷庣 庥帢廔 帢巹怷彖庰 廒 庣弇怷彃缶誕庰 庥怷帢廔 弮庣怷彃缶誕庰繚 廔裒 廔 庥帢廔 弮彖怷彖 庰庣彄剿庛帢巹 帢弮庰彖 庥帢帠弮帢庰庰庛帢庣 怷廔磁 彖彃缶 庰彖怷弇怷帠怷彃缶誕帢.
42. Sopatros in Hermog. W V 7.15 postquam antiquorum technographorum usque ad Isocratem nomina enarravit: 庥帢廔 彄剿帢庣 弮廔統 帢廔帢庣 帤庢弮帢帠帠庣庥帢廔 峟彖帢庣 庰廒區巹彖, 怷廔帤峟彖 庰廔 峎庰彖 廒怷帢庣 庥庰峎弇帢庣怷彖 廒 怷彖 彃僇 彖彃缶 廒庣庢帤庰怷弮峟彖彖, 庣庛帢彖庢怷 帤峟 庣彖怷, 彃剿 帤庰彃 帤彃弮怷彖 廔帢帠帢帠峟庛帢庣.
Isocratis 13.19 locum supra laudatum posthac (26) idem profert. Cf. supra A V 22.
43. Plato Phaedr. 261B: 弮峎弇庣庣帢 弮峟彖 庰廔 帤巹庥帢 弇峟帠庰帢庣 庥帢廔 帠峎庰帢庣 峟彖彃, 弇峟帠庰帢庣 帤廔 庥帢廔 庰廔 帤庢弮庢帠怷巹帢, 廒廔 弇峟怷彖 帤廔 怷廔庥 廒庥峸庥怷帢.
Itaque non novit 帠帠峎弮弮怷帢帢 庰廔 帤庢弮庢帠怷巹帢. 7. etiam Brandst瓣tter p. 191 adn. 2.
44. Plato Rei publ. 365D adulescentes secum reputantes facit: 廒弇弇宎 廔弮, 庰廒 弮峟弇弇怷弮庰彖 庰廔帤帢庣弮怷彖峸庰庣彖, 帢庢 廒區峟怷彖, 廔＋ 廔 廒棲彖庢 彃僇 弇帠彖 峟庰庣. 廒廔 帠廔區 廔 弇帢彖庛峎彖庰庣彖 彖弮怷巹帢 庰 庥帢廔 廒帢庣庰巹帢 彖峎徆怷弮庰彖, 庰廒剿巹彖 庰 庰庣庛怷彃羊 帤庣帤峎庥帢弇怷庣 怷巹帢彖 帤庢弮庢 帠怷庣庥峸彖 庰 庥帢廔 帤庣庥帢彖庣庥廔棒 帤庣帤彖庰, 廒徆 廔形 廔 弮廔統 庰巹怷弮庰彖, 廔 帤廔 帣庣帢弮庰庛帢, 廔＋ 弇庰怷彖庰庥怷彃缶誕庰 帤巹庥庢彖 弮廔 帤庣帤彖帢庣.
Cf. Gorg. 452E. Euthydem. 290A. Aristoteles Eth. Nicom. 1181a4 politicos spectans: 庥帢巹怷庣 庥峎弇弇庣怷彖 廒缶 廒區 (帠峎庰庣彖 庰廔 彃僇 怷庣怷彖) 廒 弇帠怷 帤庣庥帢彖庣庥怷 庰 庥帢廔 帤庢弮庢帠怷庣庥怷, Philod. rhet. I p. 132.7: 廒弇弇廔 [廔棒 峟彖庢彖 弇峟帠怷庣彖 庰廒僇諄敖 庰廔 [廔區 帤庢弮]庢帠怷巹帢 [庥帢廔 廔區 帤]庥帢. Platonem ipsum sex species rhetorices distinxisse tradit Diogenes Laert. 3.59 (93); sunt autem 怷怷峸, 廒怷怷峸, 庥帢庢 帠怷巹帢, 廒怷弇怷帠巹帢, 廒帠庥弮庣怷彖, 帠怷, quibus septimum 廔 廒徆庰帢庣庥彖 addit Anaximenes, numeri septem amator, sed ne is quidem plura quam duo genera orationum publicarum agnoscit, iudiciale et contionale, itaque 廔 廒庣帤庰庣庥庣庥彖 proprium genus ante Aristotelem fuisse non videtur.
45. Isocr. Evag. 9.8: 怷廒僇棒 弮廔統 怷廔彖, 廔庣 帢弇庰彖 廒庣彖, 廔 弮峟弇弇 怷庣庰彃彖, 廒彖帤廔裒 廒庰廔棒 帤庣廔 弇帠彖 廒帠庥弮庣峎庤庰庣彖. 庢弮庰彃怷彖 帤廔 弮峟帠庣怷彖繚 庰廔 弮廔統 帠廔區 廒弇弇彖 怷弇弇彃僇 庥帢廔 帢彖怷帤帢彃僇 弇峟帠庰庣彖 怷弇弮彃剿庣彖 怷廒 庰廔 廔棒 庣弇怷怷巹帢彖 廔彖庰, 庰廔 帤廔 彃僇 怷庣怷彖 怷廔帤庰彃 怷宎 帢廔彃僇 帠帠峎庰庣彖 廒庰庰巹庢庰彖.
46. Aristot. Eth. Nic. 1101b64, postquam, quae sit inter laudem atque encomium diEerentia, exposuit: 廒弇弇廔 帢彃羊帢 弮廔統 廒棲 怷廒匿睡舒圖庰怷彖 廒徆帢庥庣帣怷彃缶 怷彃 庰廔 廔 廒帠庥弮庣帢 庰怷彖庢弮峟彖怷庣. Ipsum Isocratem eiusque discipulos videtur intellegere.
47. Aristot. Rhet. 1403b35: 怷廔 帤廔 帠庥庰庣帢庣 峟彖庢 庰廔 帢廔彃僇 (sc. 彃僇 庰廔 廔棒 廔庥庣庣彖), 廒庰廔 庥帢廔 廔 庰廔 廔棒 弇峟徆庣彖 廔峟 怷彃弇庛庰彖.
48. Aristot. Rhet. 1404a12: 廒庥庰巹彖庢 (i e. 廒 弇峟徆庣) 弮廔統 怷廔彖 廔帢彖 廒弇庛庢, 帢廔廔 怷庣峸庰庣 彃 廔怷庥庣庣庥彃. 廒帠庥庰庰庣峸庥帢庣彖 帤峟 廒宎 廒弇巹帠怷彖 庰廔 帢廔彃 庰廒區庰彃彖 庣彖庰, 怷廒煎諺 帢弮帢怷 廒彖 怷彃 廒弇峟怷庣.
49. Aristot. Rhet. 1403 h 20: 巹怷彖 帤廔 怷彖, 廔 帤彖帢弮庣彖 弮廔統 廒庰庣 弮庰帠巹庢彖, 怷廔 帤宎 廒庣庥庰庰巹庢帢庣, 廔 庰廔 廔棒 廔庥庣庣彖.
Cf. ibid. 31 sq.
50. Rufin. Comm. de numeris oratoriis, Gramm. lat. VI 573, 22K. (Rhet. at. min. p. 581. 14H.: vi B VII 38.
51. Longini rhet. p. 201. 24H.: 帤庢 帤廔 庥帢廔 峉庣弮彖巹帤庢 庥帢廔 弇庰巹怷 弮庰宎 廒庥庰彃彖怷彖 弮彖峸弮庢 {帠彖弮庢} 廔帤怷廔磁 怷廔帤巹帤帢徆帢彖, 庰廒匿棲弇彖 帢峎庛庰庣彖 庥帢廔 彖 庰廒區庢帠怷弮庰彖怷庣 廔裒 廔 弮彖庢弮怷彖庰庰庣彖 廒庰庣彖 (7) 廔彖怷弮峎彖 庰 庥帢廔 彃用煎樁疢彖.
Cf. Quint. Inst. 11.2.11 sq. Amm. Marc. 16.5.8, Dialexeis 9 et de Hippia Eleo infra, de Antiphonte 2.10.7. F. Solmsen, Die Entwicklung der aristot. Logik und Rhetorik (Neue philol. Unters. 4) 171 sq.
52. Philod. Rhet. I p. 79.23 S. (Philod. Suppl p. M.2): 廒弇庰徆巹彖怷 帠廔區 廒彖 怷彃 峇庰廔 廒帠帠彃 庥帢庢帠怷怷彃缶誕怷 彃僇 彃用煙怷庣庥彃僇 怷庣彃僇, 廔庣 怷弇弇廔 庤庢怷彃羊庣彖 廒峸, 廔形 廒庣 庥帢廔 廔 庰廔 廔棒 弇峟徆庣彖 帢廔彃僇 帢帠弮峎庰弮帢 庥帢廔 廔 庰廔 廔棒 弮彖峸弮庢彖 (v. supra 36).
Plato Leg. 811A: 怷廒 帤廔 廒庥 峎彖彖 (scil. 怷庣庢彃僇) 庥庰峎弇帢庣帢 廒庥弇峟徆帢彖庰 庥帢巹 庣彖帢 廔弇帢 彃用晅庰庣 庰廒區 帢廔廔 彖帢帠帢帠彖庰 廒庥弮帢彖庛峎彖庰庣彖 帢廔 帤庰彃彖, 庰廒區 弮 彖 峸弮庢彖 庣庛庰弮 峟彖怷, 庰廒 弮峟弇弇庰庣 庣 廒帠帢庛廔裒 廒﹡澄彖 庥帢廔 怷廔裒 廒庥 怷弇 庰庣巹帢 庥帢廔 怷弇弮帢庛巹帢 帠庰彖峟庛帢庣. Sophistas dici puto, nisi vero ipse Hippias intellegitur.