丁香园AV

Content Notes (CN), Content Warnings (CW), and/or Trigger Warnings (TW) (hereafter referred to as Content Notes) have all been the subject of widespread discussion and debate both in academia and in popular culture. The focus of these discussions has been varied and included questions surrounding the effectiveness of such warnings as a part of trauma-informed practices for supporting safe learning environments () and concerns about the ways they might constrain academic freedom and rigour (). Unfortunately, in these debates, the latter two (safe environments and academic freedom) are often pitted against each other, as exemplified in a 2018 Inside Higher Ed article which posits a dichotomous discussion in which faculty have to choose between 鈥渄efending free speech鈥� or 鈥渉elping students feel emotionally safe鈥� ().

The Problematics of an Either/Or Approach

We contend that this either/or thinking, itself, presents a barrier to an authentic and open-minded consideration of Content Notes and their potential role in our classrooms. Recognizing ¹, we understand either/or thinking as a defining characteristic of white supremacy culture, within which settler-colonial universities have historically framed their work. This kind of thinking cannot truly support antiracist and decolonized teaching and learning practices.

All too often, the either/or approach leads to the assumption that instructors should not be teaching any content that might be triggering or even mildly uncomfortable for students. This understanding has led some institutions to issue statements, such as this one from the Dean of Students at the University of Chicago: 鈥淵ou will find that we expect members of our community to be engaged in rigorous debate, discussion and even disagreement. At times this may challenge you and even cause discomfort鈥� (). This statement was included in a letter explicitly stating that the university does not support 鈥渟o-called trigger warnings鈥� and pitting these warnings against academic freedom, stating that it was because of their 鈥渃ommitment to academic freedom鈥� that trigger warnings were not supported at the university (Jaschik, 2016).

An Invitation into Both/And Thinking

In this post, we invite you to take a both/and approach to considering Content Notes. As such, we suggest that Content Notes may be both a part of a trauma-informed approach to creating safer learning environments and insufficient in and of themselves. We also suggest that using Content Notes can be both a way of supporting student learning and a way to exercise academic freedom and rigour.

This both/and approach requires us to make two important distinctions about Content Notes and their pedagogical applications.There are two important distinctions to be made here. The first is to clearly differentiate between content that is triggering and content that is 鈥渃hallenging鈥� or likely to 鈥渃ause discomfort.鈥� The concept of triggering content originates in the study of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), which is characterized by 鈥渞e-experiencing symptoms鈥� (such as flashbacks), which can be 鈥渢riggered鈥� by content related to the initial traumatic event(s) -- the primary source(s) of the trauma ()². Such triggering content is clearly distinct from content that is intellectually challenging or even content that causes students to experience discomfort, such as through questioning long-held beliefs. While intellectual challenge and even discomfort can be part of stimulating students鈥� new learning, being triggered into a 鈥渞e-experiencing symptom鈥� has been shown clearly in the literature to negatively impact students鈥� abilities to cope during class and to therefore be associated with significant barriers to academic success (). While challenging and even uncomfortable content may engage students in their learning and promote inquiry, triggering content does the opposite: it prevents learning from taking place.

The second distinction is to clarify that the use of Content Notes does not imply that instructors must necessarily remove content from their courses, even content that has the potential to be triggering. Taking a both/and approach allows us to understand Content Notes as an invitation for faculty to engage critically with their own discipline(s) and pedagogy and teaching practices in ways that are fundamentally in line with academic rigour and freedom. Content Notes may thereby function as part of a reflective pedagogical practice that supports faculty in creating and maintaining courses that are stimulating, challenging, rigorous, and meaningful to the diverse communities of undergraduate and graduate learners who make up our campuses and our classrooms at 丁香园AV.

Content Notes Aren't Just about Content

It is important to acknowledge that what some instructors and students find challenging, uncomfortable, and even disturbing content is not just content to be studied for others. Rather, for some instructors and students this content will serve as a reminder of their own lived experiences. Even when individuals are not managing PTSD or a clinically-defined trigger it can be unproductive to have to study your own experiences as course content鈥揳s an object of study鈥揺specially if taught insensitively by someone who does not share in those experiences. Such objectification dehumanizes and displaces actual people鈥檚 lived experiences through intellectualizing processes.

Let鈥檚 work through a rather benign example: imagine you grew up in a family of mechanics and were helping to fix cars from the time you were 5-years-old. You would likely find it at-best unhelpful and also likely cringeworthy to learn about car mechanics from someone who had only ever experienced a car in a textbook. When the content in question is more sensitive than car mechanics, students鈥� reactions can be even more complex. Taking up the work suggested by Content Notes is, therefore, about challenging ourselves to consider who is in the classroom and what kinds of experiences they bring with them. It is also about respecting lived experiences鈥揺ven traumatic ones鈥揳s a form of knowledge that students bring with them, recognizing that students³ have lived distinct lives and consequently have diverse relationships to, and need for, the course content we choose to present. Content Notes open the opportunity for students to make their own responsible choices about courses and course content.

What the Scholarship Shows Us

In our research for this post, we looked at literature that details the academic experiences and outcomes of Black students who have experienced trauma, including sexual assault, robbery, and other violence (); students who are refugee trauma survivors (); students who are war veterans (); students coming to university from the foster care system (鈥嬧��), and students who have experienced sexual violence (). Even this small snapshot of the existing literature reveals that, in any given university classroom, there are students who have experienced a broad-spectrum of types of trauma in their lives.

The potential presence of diverse forms of trauma in a classroom is also often used as an argument against providing Content Notes. The line of questioning goes: 鈥淗ow can I possibly know what might be triggering for my students?鈥� and 鈥淚sn鈥檛 any content potentially uncomfortable for someone?鈥� It is for that reason that we hope to encourage a focus on Content Notes, rather than on Trigger Warnings, specifically. While there are useful resources that suggest the types of content that are known to be likely triggers (see, for example, from the Maryland Institute College of Art), the approach to Content Notes that we are suggesting involves providing brief summary overviews and keywords about the content engaged with both in the course and in specific texts. It is, of course, helpful to flag content that is connected to known triggers, but the overall focus is about providing students with information about the educational goals of the course and the content used in the course to address those goals. This, in turn, allows students to make informed decisions about their own intellectual, emotional, physical, and spiritual capacity for engaging with the course content.

Content Notes as Pedagogical Communication

Content Notes are a useful tool for providing proactive communication about course content in ways that respect students鈥� autonomy, lived experiences, knowledge of themselves, and responsibility for their education. Where relevant, instructors may provide alternative course content that supports the identified educational goals and, where this is not possible or relevant, the instructor can explain that the specific content is not gratuitous to the course or selected for 鈥渟hock value,鈥� but rather an integral part of the educational goals and requirements for the course. Students can then determine whether engaging with that content will be possible and meaningful for them at this time in their lives.

Of course, on their own, Content Notes are not sufficient to accomplish a trauma-informed pedagogy or safer classroom learning experience. However, engaging in the reflective process suggested by this approach is an integral part of trauma-informed practice. What is made clear through trauma-informed work is that there is no 鈥渙ne right way鈥� (Okun) and so we can鈥檛 simply create our course content once and for all. Instead, for our classroom content and pedagogy to maintain its relevance and significance, we must listen to and learn from our students () -- all the more so when they challenge our habitual and comfortable practices as educators.

¹ To learn more about Okun鈥檚 work on White Supremacy Culture:

² For a concise explanation of the impacts of trauma and PTSD, refer to .  

³ Instructors, too, have often experienced a broad-spectrum of traumas, though less literature has been written with a specific focus on instructors鈥� trauma in the classroom.