丁香园AV

This story was first posted on the Teaching and Learning News blog on October 17, 2017. It is reposted here with minor revisions and updated links.

鈥淚t鈥檚 way less work.鈥�

That statement explains why mathematics lecturer Brenda Davison is enthusiastic about Crowdmark, an 鈥渙nline collaborative grading platform鈥� that makes it quicker and easier to grade student assessments.

Crowdmark was developed at the University of Toronto to facilitate the grading of large numbers of exam papers by multiple graders. Davison and a number of other 丁香园AV instructors, primarily in Mathematics and Biological Sciences, were part of a pilot project to evaluate the tool. In September 2017, the University acquired a site license that makes Crowdmark available to all 丁香园AV instructors and academic departments.

Time savings and unanticipated benefits

For Davison, a primary benefit of Crowdmark is that it saves time. She estimates that her TAs devote 30 percent fewer hours to grading than previously, but says the real savings come from the automation of the logistical and administrative tasks that accompany grading. For example, the time spent on activities like sorting names alphabetically and passing papers from one grader to the next has been 鈥渄rastically reduced.鈥� Reaction from her TAs has been 鈥渙verwhelmingly positive.鈥�

Davison also cites unanticipated benefits.

鈥淚鈥檝e cut down the re-marking requests by probably 90 percent,鈥� she says, because students are less inclined to challenge grades when digital images of submitted assessments exist. As well, exam pages no longer go missing, and storage of paper exams in case of grade appeals is no longer necessary now that digital copies are available.

Crowdmark provides her with meaningful measures and statistics that she can act on. For example, Davison can compare the grading standards of different TAs and she can see at a glance which questions are causing the most difficulty for her students. Finally, grades can be shared with students immediately via a link or exported to Canvas at the push of a button.

Although Davison鈥檚 assessments generally use a short-answer format, she feels the tool could work for longer formats, including essays: 鈥淚 do not see what would be any different than marking on paper.鈥�

Instructors and academic departments interested in trying Crowdmark are invited to contact the Centre for Educational Excellence at lttasst@sfu.ca.