丁香园AV

The pandemic is one of several crises that Vancouver and other cities are facing, and they are all connected. There are no simple solutions to these complex challenges. This reinforces the importance of long-range planning, even as we work to respond to current crises.  

Moderator Ken Cameron opened the session with remarks on how COVID-19 is a turning point in our society, marking the end of an era that began with the spirit of reconstruction after World War II. The pandemic has disrupted nearly every aspect of our economic, social and cultural lives and it has had significant environmental impacts, prompting us to rethink the city and what it needs to do to continue meeting the needs of citizens. Ken reminded us that 鈥淗istory has shown that crises, if managed property, lead to better cities.鈥�

Unfortunately, we don鈥檛 have video of Ken Cameron鈥檚 introduction or the first portion of Mayor Kennedy Stewart鈥檚 remarks, but we do have transcripts! 

Mayor Kennedy Stewart

In March, Mayor Kennedy Stewart declared the first state of emergency in Vancouver鈥檚 history. Yet even before the pandemic, the city was struggling with a number of crises: the opioid overdose crisis, which is an official emergency and has been made worse by COVID-19; the problem of housing and homelessness; and the stresses coming to the surface as the Wet鈥檚uwet鈥檈n land defenders pushed back against projects on traditional territories and the murder of George Floyd sparked protests.

Jennifer Keesmat
Former Chief City Planner, Toronto

Jennifer Keesmaat argued that the public health crisis, climate crisis, social justice crisis and housing crisis are linked together, and we need to think strategically about them together. She acknowledges that the level of complexity in this moment can be intimidating and lead to inaction. While there is a growing discourse that cities are part of the problem and that we need to retreat from them, Jennifer begs to differ, arguing that we need to go deeper into our urbanism by creating green and just places to live. The, signed by a group of urbanists across Canada (land use planners, academics, developers, environmental activists, architects, designers), lays out the specific actions that would drive us to a more resilient urbanism, including:

• Responsible use of land
• Recognition that our current urban form has had detrimental effects on new Canadians, Indigenous peoples, racialized people, lower-income workers
• Embrace sustainability in our built and natural environments

Jennifer emphasized that there is no technology or big funding mechanism that will save us, there is nothing we need to invent to make cities more resilient 鈥� we know what we need to do, and how. Most importantly, we must recognize and embrace the urgency.

Heather McNell
General Manager, Regional Planning and Housing, Metro Vancouver

Heather McNell discussed how COVID-19 has impacted our learning from the Metro 2040 Regional Growth Strategy as Metro Vancouver extends the strategy to 2050 and works closely with TransLink to integrate with their Transport 2050 strategy. There is an effort to fill the gaps in the strategy that have been accentuated by the pandemic emergency, including social equity, climate action, environment and affordable housing.

Conversations about "Why should we plan for the long-term when such unforeseen events can happen?" recall the quote from Winston Churchill: 鈥淧lans are of little importance, but planning is essential.鈥� The plan is vulnerable to disruptors and external forces, but planning is about our thinking and perspective, a way to build common objectives, goals, and understanding for collective action. It also helps us think about intersectionality of different crises and issues. We cannot predict the future, but we can make projections and do scenario planning.

A key lesson from the COVID-19 experience is the importance of considering resiliency to shocks and disruptions; and that it is also important to consider equity in each policy move we make. Heather emphasized that we need courage and vulnerability in planning to embrace uncertainty, consider discomforting scenarios and to bring excluded voices into planning.

We need to double down on our fundamental planning principles for "good density" and at the same time be flexible 鈥� make big moves in policy and social equity.

Yunji Kim
Assistant Professor, Grad School of Public Administration, Seoul National University

Yunji Kim said that South Korea succeeded at responding quickly to the pandemic and getting back to something closely resembling pre-pandemic life, but in its impatience to do so it is losing two important things: democracy and collective goods.

The Korean government responded very quickly with testing and detailed contact tracing. This was recognized globally. The quick response is in part because of Korea鈥檚 experience with past crises (a fire in a metro station with fatalities and the SARS epidemic in 2003, a ferry disaster in 2014, and an earthquake and experience with MERS in 2015) and resulting changes to legislation and emergency management laws. It is also partly due to social norms, a collectivist culture, and rapid information sharing through social media.

Yunji noted that density was never up for debate in Korea 鈥� density allows for a more equal society, and more collective goods. The country鈥檚 strong response to the pandemic involved taking away some of these collective goods, like exercise equipment in many public parks and cooling centres for people to spend time in a cool place during heat waves. This loss of collective goods especially impacts people who do not have the financial means to rely on private goods.

While day-to-day life appears to be back to pre-COVID-19 times in Korea, the government is banning political protests. Organizers of one protest proposed a drive-through protest and the Seoul administrative court ruled against even that.

At the same time, local governments are introducing new ways to deliver public services to citizens, and innovating on ways to provide social welfare services.

Am JohalDirector, 丁香园AV's Vancity Office of Community Engagement

Am Johal challenged us to consider 鈥淲hose city is it? Who does it embrace, who does it marginalize, and who does it push away from eligibility?鈥� The current crisis calls for disruption and fundamental change in values and our experiences in cities.

Am said that racial and economic injustices are built-in forms based on planning decisions founded on flawed and narrow assumptions, but planning can also bring about things like public health care, social housing, pensions, employment insurance. Planning departments need to be as diverse as the cities they plan for. We need to move from transactional to transformational planning, and think from within the lived experience of the city and its inhabitants. Planning must rethink its relationship to the state and land politics, particularly in urban contexts.

Cities need more resources and regulatory power to work around intergovernmental stalemates. Am argues that if COVID-19 was a test run for a major earthquake, (the focus of most of the City鈥檚 emergency planning) where services are disabled, then we are not prepared. We must consider who determines what recovery looks like and on what terms it rolls out. Inhabitants of a city must have agency, participation and decision-making in the recovery.

Is "resilience" the bullshit word of the moment if planning does not center social solidarity and social justice, and build in the participation of those affected by decisions?

People are inhabiting public space in new ways, and moving forward. We need to bring joy back to the city, invest more in the social infrastructure of arts and culture, invest south of the Fraser and the suburbs, and move beyond brick and mortar solutions to address multiple challenges we are facing.

Am concludes that the work of 鈥渓ove for the city and solidarity as a moral position鈥� is the work for all of us, to be "done in the everyday with joy, love, poetry, ferocity, velocity, generosity and solidarity鈥�.

Read a transcript of Am鈥檚 comments .
 

Ken Cameron鈥檚 six takeaways

Moderator Ken Cameron synthesized six key takeaways from the discussion that we need to think about and carry forward.

1. Today鈥檚 problems (eg climate emergency, homelessness) aren鈥檛 going away 鈥� they will still be there during and after the pandemic. Yet we have "Amazon Prime" expectations of policy - as Mayor Stewart described it - of immediate implementation and resolution of entrenched problems.
2. We are in a unique moment in time that comes with huge opportunities as well as huge challenges.
3. Vision, values and principles are even more important than ever. One principle 鈥� the responsible use of land 鈥� is a basic concern of making a better city.
4. We face dual challenges in our urban planning, and we heard this particularly from Metro Vancouver: Double down and deal with the immediate crisis, but also be flexible going forward and make sure we are developing solutions that will stand the test of time.
5. We must heed the warning from Yunji that democracy and engagement could very easily become casualties of an effort to focus on a crisis and to come out of a crisis.  have to ensure that our democracy and our democratic principles and the relationships between government and the governed are healthy.
6. Am presents a new view of what engagement and inclusion is in terms of what the challenges are both to citizens and to elected people and to professionals of ensuring that the city rediscovers or, in fact, discovers all of its population, all of the interests that it should be properly representing in a democratic community and what that means for the question of resilience, which Ken is not prepared yet to call a "BS word."