Advance Preparation or Active Learning: What Makes the Difference in a Flipped Classroom of International Students?
Grant program: Teaching and Learning Development Grant (TLDG)
Grant recipient: Joan Sharp, Biological Sciences
Project team: Michael Silvergieter and Sharla Stolhandske, Fraser International College, Alia Arslanova and Ana Vargas, research assistants
Timeframe: April 2017 to October 2018
Funding: $6000
Course addressed: BISC 100 – Introduction to Biology
Description: A typical ‘flipped classroom’ involves two simultaneous changes in course delivery: advance preparation by students and an increase in active learning activities in the classroom. With this grant, my co-participants and I plan to investigate the separate effects of advance preparation and active learning that are typically combined in a ‘flipped classroom’. Sharla Stolhandske and Mike Silvergieter have taught separate sections of Introduction to Biology BISC 100 for Fraser International College for many years. Mike teaches in a fully flipped classroom with active learning and required videos for advance preparation, while Sharla teaches primarily by lectures. Both are prepared to modify student preparation and classroom activities over a number of semesters and to test the separate and combined effects of advance preparation and active learning with the use of concept inventories and identical exam questions. We will also carry out focus groups and, based on focus group discussions, structure a survey to assess students’ perception of their engagement in the course, their interest in the subject matter, their motivation to engage with course content with the three delivery methods.
Questions addressed:
- How does the in-class time spent on active learning compare between Michael and Sharla’s classes?
- Do student scores on a concept inventory increase with advance preparation or with both advance preparation and increased active learning?
- Does student performance on higher order exam questions increase with advance preparation or with both advance preparation and increased active learning?
- How do student perceptions of their learning, enjoyment, and motivation change in classrooms with lecture delivery and assigned readings, with lecture delivery combined with advance preparation in the form of required videos, or with both advance preparation and increased active learning?
- What is the relationship between English-language fluency and views of classroom experience in classrooms with advance preparation or with both advance preparation and increased active learning?
Knowledge sharing: These findings could be presented at TLC events, at TLC sponsored conferences at ¶¡ÏãÔ°AV, and in departmental seminars. We would also like to present a seminar on our findings at Fraser International College.
View Joan Sharp's ISTLD-funded projects:
Case Studies for a Flipped Classroom (G0130)
Program Evaluation in the Biological Sciences Department (G0270) - with Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Evaluation of Virtual/Augmented Reality Activities in BISC 316 Vertebrate Biology Labs (G0350) - with Tammy McMullan
Expanding STEM Literacy through Content-Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) in an Undergraduate Biology Classroom (G0388) - with Angel M.Y. Lin
Fostering a Community of Practice Among Teaching Assistants Through Peer Observation and Reflective Discussion (G0394) - with Megan Barker
From Map to Essay: Designing and Evaluating DMap Features that Scaffold Linear Structuring of Argumentative Writing (G0411) - with John Nesbit
Supporting our TAs: Integrating a Teaching Skills Development Program Within Undergraduate Biology Courses to Enrich the Graduate Student Learning Experience (G0324) - with Megan Barker
View Sharla Stolhandske's ISTLD-funded projects:
Advance Preparation or Active Learning: What Makes the Difference in a Flipped Classroom of International Students? (G0219) - with Joan Sharp
Measuring Student Improvement in Climate Literacy in a First-Year Interdisciplinary Climate Change Course (G0410) - with Tara Holland