Natural Solutions Initiative
Promoting Cohesion Across Four Scales of NbS Action
Across the globe, NbS projects are being implemented at different scales. While some NbS practices are based on multi-lateral arrangements (e.g., Québec and California’s Linked Cap-and-Trade program) or national policies (e.g., Canadian federal conservation programs), the NSI is focused on NbS at regional and local scales that have direct ecosystem and community benefits. Specifically, the NSI investigates NbS that are being implemented at the watershed, neighbourhood, community and parcel scales, and how to bring cohesion to NbS projects and plans both within communities and across watersheds.
Figure 3 below depicts the diverse NbS activities being applied across four scales. It is an abbreviated depiction of a broad review of scholarship and practice, and showcases the interdependencies between scales and the need for more cohesive NbS planning to support and enhance ecological processes and ecosystem services across scales. Ensuring that baseline ecological data and key indicators of health and resilience at the watershed scale are the foundation of NbS planning and practice helps to ensure that NbS are being applied across scales in a way that supports nature and, by proxy, the communities that benefit from a functioning and healthy ecosystem.
Advancing Systemic NbS Across Five Key Areas
Natural systems and NbS cross many disciplines (e.g., ecology, conservation biology, natural resource management, community and social planning, engineering) and are impacted by diverse issues (e.g., development and encroachment, climate changes, Indigenous territorial rights, etc.). While the pace of NbS implementation has been accelerating, projects are being designed to achieve specific, often singular objectives, minimizing the multi-solving potential of NbS to address numerous societal challenges.
An extensive review of scholarship and practice demonstrates how NbS are being applied to advance five key areas: 1) climate action (both adaptation and mitigation); 2) biodiversity; 3) Indigenous knowledges and leadership; 4) sustainable service delivery; and 5) health, equity, and justice.
The NSI assumption is that NbS planning is a crucial climate action strategy, with a suite of approaches and tools, that can be used to address key societal challenges simultaneously. Viewing NbS in this way encourages collaboration across disciplines and sectors to consider synergies and expand opportunities to optimize NbS values and valuations, and to document trade-offs and barriers in a more transparent manner. This more systemic approach to NbS planning could be used to streamline metrics and monitoring protocols in practice, and lead to innovative governance and financing. The NSI aims to support the development of more systemic planning in practice, that accounts for and addresses synergies and trade-offs across NbS goals and objectives.
NSI Research-to-Action Phases
With the goals of the NSI in mind, ACT’s work will proceed in three phases:
Phase 1 (2021-2023): Co-develop a Framework-for- Action with leading researchers and practitioners across scales to multi-solve diverse key areas, build upon best practices and identify trade-offs.
Phase 2 (2023-Ongoing): Partner with Indigenous, local government, and public and private sector actors and organizations to tailor, co-create, and evaluate NbS across four scales of action.
Phase 3 (2023-Ongoing): Mobilize learning throughout the research process, identifying important values, metrics, and indicators, best practice approaches, and key opportunities to advance and scale NbS.
ACT invites collaboration and partnership from national, regional and local organizations to build a community of practice aimed at applying the NSI Framework-for-Action. The goal is to promote cohesive and systemic NbS to address the multiple challenges that ecosystems and communities are facing now and into future, and to advance knowledge that builds resilience and sustainability for people and nature. By working collaboratively, we can catalyze learning and innovation, and advance best practices. We encourage interested parties to contact us below.
References
UNEP (2022). Nature-based Solutions: Opportunities and Challenges for Scaling Up. United Nations Environmental Programme.
GIO (n.d.). What is Green Infrastructure? Green Infrastructure Ontario Coalition. and Matsler, M. A. (2019). Making ‘green’ fit in a ‘grey’ accounting system: The institutional knowledge system challenges of valuing urban nature as infrastructural assets. Environmental Science & Policy, 99, 160–168.